Prediction of complications in early-onset pre-eclampsia (PREP): development and external multinational validation of prognostic models
- PMID: 28356148
- PMCID: PMC5372261
- DOI: 10.1186/s12916-017-0827-3
Prediction of complications in early-onset pre-eclampsia (PREP): development and external multinational validation of prognostic models
Abstract
Background: Unexpected clinical deterioration before 34 weeks gestation is an undesired course in early-onset pre-eclampsia. To safely prolong preterm gestation, accurate and timely prediction of complications is required.
Method: Women with confirmed early onset pre-eclampsia were recruited from 53 maternity units in the UK to a large prospective cohort study (PREP-946) for development of prognostic models for the overall risk of experiencing a complication using logistic regression (PREP-L), and for predicting the time to adverse maternal outcome using a survival model (PREP-S). External validation of the models were carried out in a multinational cohort (PIERS-634) and another cohort from the Netherlands (PETRA-216). Main outcome measures were C-statistics to summarise discrimination of the models and calibration plots and calibration slopes.
Results: A total of 169 mothers (18%) in the PREP dataset had adverse outcomes by 48 hours, and 633 (67%) by discharge. The C-statistics of the models for predicting complications by 48 hours and by discharge were 0.84 (95% CI, 0.81-0.87; PREP-S) and 0.82 (0.80-0.84; PREP-L), respectively. The PREP-S model included maternal age, gestation, medical history, systolic blood pressure, deep tendon reflexes, urine protein creatinine ratio, platelets, serum alanine amino transaminase, urea, creatinine, oxygen saturation and treatment with antihypertensives or magnesium sulfate. The PREP-L model included the above except deep tendon reflexes, serum alanine amino transaminase and creatinine. On validation in the external PIERS dataset, the reduced PREP-S model showed reasonable calibration (slope 0.80) and discrimination (C-statistic 0.75) for predicting adverse outcome by 48 hours. Reduced PREP-L model showed excellent calibration (slope: 0.93 PIERS, 0.90 PETRA) and discrimination (0.81 PIERS, 0.75 PETRA) for predicting risk by discharge in the two external datasets.
Conclusions: PREP models can be used to obtain predictions of adverse maternal outcome risk, including early preterm delivery, by 48 hours (PREP-S) and by discharge (PREP-L), in women with early onset pre-eclampsia in the context of current care. They have a potential role in triaging high-risk mothers who may need transfer to tertiary units for intensive maternal and neonatal care.
Trial registration: ISRCTN40384046 , retrospectively registered.
Keywords: Complications; Early-onset; Maternal; Pre-eclampsia; Prognostic models.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Development and validation of Prediction models for Risks of complications in Early-onset Pre-eclampsia (PREP): a prospective cohort study.Health Technol Assess. 2017 Apr;21(18):1-100. doi: 10.3310/hta21180. Health Technol Assess. 2017. PMID: 28412995 Free PMC article.
-
A prognostic model to guide decision-making on timing of delivery in late preterm pre-eclampsia: the PEACOCK prospective cohort study.Health Technol Assess. 2021 May;25(30):1-32. doi: 10.3310/hta25300. Health Technol Assess. 2021. PMID: 34024312 Free PMC article.
-
Validation and development of models using clinical, biochemical and ultrasound markers for predicting pre-eclampsia: an individual participant data meta-analysis.Health Technol Assess. 2020 Dec;24(72):1-252. doi: 10.3310/hta24720. Health Technol Assess. 2020. PMID: 33336645 Free PMC article.
-
Calcium supplementation commencing before or early in pregnancy, for preventing hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Sep 16;9(9):CD011192. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011192.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 31523806 Free PMC article.
-
Antiplatelet agents for preventing pre-eclampsia and its complications.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 30;2019(10):CD004659. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004659.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 31684684 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Thresholds for Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Based on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Late Pregnancy in a Southern Chinese Population.J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Jul 16;8(14):e012027. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012027. Epub 2019 Jul 3. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019. PMID: 31267796 Free PMC article.
-
Maternal medicine in the COVID era.Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2021 Jun;73:113-124. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2021.03.003. Epub 2021 Mar 18. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2021. PMID: 33839044 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Consecutive prediction of adverse maternal outcomes of preeclampsia, using the PIERS-ML and fullPIERS models: A multicountry prospective observational study.PLoS Med. 2025 Feb 4;22(2):e1004509. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004509. eCollection 2025 Feb. PLoS Med. 2025. PMID: 39903757 Free PMC article.
-
Angiogenic Biomarkers: Are They Good Tools to Predict Perinatal Outcomes in Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy? A Retrospective Cohort Study.Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Mar 21;15(7):799. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15070799. Diagnostics (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40218149 Free PMC article.
-
Prediction of Adverse Outcomes in De Novo Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: Development and Validation of Maternal and Neonatal Prognostic Models.Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Nov 18;10(11):2307. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10112307. Healthcare (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36421631 Free PMC article.
References
-
- MacKay AP, Berg CJ, Atrash HK. Pregnancy-related mortality from preeclampsia and eclampsia. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;97(4):533–8. - PubMed
-
- von Dadelszen P, Payne B, Li J, Ansermino JM, Broughton-Pipkin F, Cote AM, Douglas MJ, Gruslin A, Hutcheon JA, Joseph KS, Kyle PM, Lee T, Loughna P, Menzies JM, Merialdi M, Millman AL, Moore MP, Moutquin JM, Ouellet AB, Smith GN, Walker JJ, Walley KR, Walters BN, Widmer M, Lee SK, Russell JA, Magee LA, PIERS Study Group Prediction of adverse maternal outcomes in pre-eclampsia: development and validation of the fullPIERS model. Lancet. 2011;377(9761):219–27. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61351-7. - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous