Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017;76(7):473-484.
doi: 10.1007/s11199-016-0679-x. Epub 2016 Sep 30.

Contact with Counter-Stereotypical Women Predicts Less Sexism, Less Rape Myth Acceptance, Less Intention to Rape (in Men) and Less Projected Enjoyment of Rape (in Women)

Affiliations

Contact with Counter-Stereotypical Women Predicts Less Sexism, Less Rape Myth Acceptance, Less Intention to Rape (in Men) and Less Projected Enjoyment of Rape (in Women)

Miriam Taschler et al. Sex Roles. 2017.

Abstract

Intergroup contact-(positive) interactions with people from different social groups-is a widely researched and strongly supported prejudice-reducing mechanism shown to reduce prejudice against a wide variety of outgroups. However, no known previous research has investigated whether intergroup contact can also reduce sexism against women. Sexism has an array of negative outcomes. One of the most detrimental and violent ones is rape, which is both justified and downplayed by rape myth acceptance. We hypothesised that more frequent, higher quality contact with counter-stereotypical women would predict lower levels of sexism and thus less rape myth acceptance (in men) and less sexualised projected responses to rape (in women). Two studies using online surveys with community samples supported these hypotheses. In Study 1, 170 male participants who experienced more positive contact with counter-stereotypical women reported less intention to rape. Similarly, in Study 2, 280 female participants who experienced more positive contact with counter-stereotypical women reported less projected sexual arousal at the thought of being raped. Thus, the present research is the first known to show that contact could be a potential tool to combat sexism, rape myth acceptance, intentions to rape in men, and sexualisation of rape by women.

Keywords: Contact hypothesis; Rape; Rape myth acceptance; Sexism; Sexual violence; Violence against women.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of Goldsmiths, University of London, UK. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Relationship between contact and intention to rape in men, mediated by hostile sexism and rape myth acceptance. *p < .05. **p < .01. ***p < .001
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Relationship between contact and projected sexual arousal in women, mediated by hostile sexism and rape myth acceptance. *p < .05. **p < .01. ***p < .001

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abrams D, Viki GT, Masser B, Bohner G. Perceptions of stranger and acquaintance rape: Role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2003;84(1):111–125. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.111. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Allport GW. The nature of prejudice. Cambridge: Perseus Books; 1954.
    1. Amin R, Nabors NS, Nelson AM, Saqlain M, Kulldorff M. Geographical clusters of rape in the United States: 2000–2012. Statistics and Public Policy. 2015;2(1):1–6. doi: 10.1080/2330443X.2015.1092899. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barlow, F. K., Paolini, S., Pedersen, A., Hornsey, M. J., Radke, H. R. M., Harwood, J., … Sibley, C. G. (2012). The contact caveat: Negative contact predicts increased prejudice more than positive contact predicts reduced prejudice. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(12), 1629–1643. doi:10.1177/0146167212457953. - PubMed
    1. Becker JC, Swim JK. Seeing the unseen: Attention to daily encounters with sexism as way to reduce sexist beliefs. Psychology of Women Quarterly. 2011;35(2):227–242. doi: 10.1177/0361684310397509. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources