Robotic-assisted hysterectomy: patient selection and perspectives
- PMID: 28356774
- PMCID: PMC5367602
- DOI: 10.2147/IJWH.S99993
Robotic-assisted hysterectomy: patient selection and perspectives
Abstract
Minimally invasive hysterectomy via the laparoscopic or vaginal approach is beneficial to patients when compared with laparotomy, but has not been offered in the past to all women because of the technical difficulties and the long learning curve required for laparoscopic hysterectomy. Robotic-assisted hysterectomy for benign indications may allow for a shorter learning curve but does not offer clear advantages over conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy in terms of surgical outcomes. In addition, robotic hysterectomy is invariably associated with increased costs. Nevertheless, this surgical approach has been widely adopted by gynecologic surgeons. The aim of this review is to describe specific indications and patients who may benefit from robotic-assisted hysterectomy. These include hysterectomy for benign conditions in cases with high surgical complexity (such as pelvic adhesive disease and endometriosis), hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for treatment of endometrial carcinoma, and obese patients. In the future, additional evidence regarding the benefits of single-site robotic hysterectomy may further modify the indications for robotic-assisted hysterectomy.
Keywords: minimally invasive hysterectomy; robotic-assisted hysterectomy; single-site laparoscopy.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure The author reports no conflicts of interest in this work.
Similar articles
-
Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010 Nov-Dec;17(6):739-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2010.07.008. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010. PMID: 20955983
-
Advantages of robotics in benign gynecologic surgery.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Aug;28(4):304-10. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000293. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2016. PMID: 27362711 Review.
-
Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Nov;215(5):650.e1-650.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.06.027. Epub 2016 Jun 22. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016. PMID: 27343568 Free PMC article.
-
Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for hysterectomy and pelvic organ prolapse repair.Fertil Steril. 2014 Oct;102(4):933-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.08.010. Fertil Steril. 2014. PMID: 25274486 Review.
-
The benefits and challenges of robotic-assisted hysterectomy.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Aug;26(4):290-4. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000080. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2014. PMID: 24914631 Review.
Cited by
-
Save our surgeons (SOS) - an explorative comparison of surgeons' muscular and cardiovascular demands, posture, perceived workload and discomfort during robotic vs. laparoscopic surgery.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Mar;307(3):849-862. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06841-5. Epub 2022 Nov 19. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023. PMID: 36401096 Free PMC article.
-
Safety and Efficacy of Robotic Hysterectomy Using an Indigenous Robotic System: A Retrospective Study.Cureus. 2025 Apr 7;17(4):e81832. doi: 10.7759/cureus.81832. eCollection 2025 Apr. Cureus. 2025. PMID: 40337576 Free PMC article.
-
Examining Disparities in Route of Surgery and Postoperative Complications in Black Race and Hysterectomy.Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jan;133(1):6-12. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002990. Obstet Gynecol. 2019. PMID: 30531569 Free PMC article.
-
Health resource utilization and costs during the first 90 days following robot-assisted hysterectomy.Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Jun;29(6):865-872. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3432-2. Epub 2017 Aug 7. Int Urogynecol J. 2018. PMID: 28785778
References
-
- Paraiso MF, Ridgeway B, Park AJ, et al. A randomized trial comparing conventional and robotically assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208:368.e1–e7. - PubMed
-
- Sarlos D, Kots L, Stevanovic N, von Felten S, Schär G. Robotic compared with conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120:604–611. - PubMed
-
- Lönnerfors C, Reynisson P, Persson J. A randomized trial comparing vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy vs robot-assisted hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015;22:78–86. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous