Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Oct;34(4):431-439.
doi: 10.1515/jomb-2015-0002. Epub 2015 Sep 19.

Prognostic Value and Daily Trend of Interleukin-6, Neutrophil CD64 Expression, C-Reactive Protein and Lipopolysaccharide-Binding Protein in Critically Ill Patients: Reliable Predictors of Outcome or Not?

Affiliations

Prognostic Value and Daily Trend of Interleukin-6, Neutrophil CD64 Expression, C-Reactive Protein and Lipopolysaccharide-Binding Protein in Critically Ill Patients: Reliable Predictors of Outcome or Not?

Dragan Djordjevic et al. J Med Biochem. 2015 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Severe sepsis and/or trauma complicated by multiple organ dysfunction syndrome are the leading causes of death in critically ill patients. The aim of this prospective single-centre study was to assess the prognostic value and daily trend of interleukin-6 (IL-6), neutrophil CD64 expression, C-reactive protein (CRP) and lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP) regarding outcome in critically ill patients with severe trauma and/or severe sepsis. Outcome measure was hospital mortality.

Methods: One hundred and two critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit of a tertiary university hospital were enrolled in this prospective study. Blood samples were collected on admission (day 1), days 2 and 3.

Results: CD64 index was 1.6-fold higher on day 1 and 1.78-fold higher on day 2 in non-survivors (p<0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) for the CD64 index on day 1 for outcome was 0.727. At a cut-off level of 2.80 sensitivity was 75% and specificity was 65%. Patients with CD64 index level on day 1 higher than 2.80 had 2.4-fold higher probability of dying. Odds ratio is 2.40; 95% CI 0.60-9.67.

Conclusions: CD64 index on day 1 is a fairly good predictor of outcome. AUCs for IL-6, CRP and LBP were < 0.55, suggesting these biomarkers failed to predict outcome.

Uvod: Teška sepsa i/ili trauma kod koje se kao komplikacija javlja sindrom multiple organske disfunkcije je vodeći uzrok smrti kod kritično obolelih. Cilj ove prospektivne studije je bio da se proceni prognostička vrednost i utvrdi kinetika inter-leukina-6 (IL-6), ekspresije CD64 na neutrofilima, C-reaktivnog proteina (CRP) i proteina koji vezuje lipopolisaharid (lipopolysaccharide-binding protein – LBP) u smislu ishoda kod kritično obolelih sa teškom traumom i/ili teškom sepsom. Mera ishoda je bio hospitalni mortalitet.

Metode: Sto dva kritično obolela pacijenta primljena u jedini-cu intenzivne terapije tercijarne univerzitetske bolnice su obu-hvaćena prospektivnom studijom. Uzorci krvi su sakupljani na dan prijema (dan 1), a zatim drugog i trećeg dana.

Rezultati: CD64 indeks je bio 1,6 puta viši prvog dana i 1,78 puta viši drugog dana kod umrlih (p<0,05). Vrednost AUC/ROC za CD64 indeks prvog dana u smislu predikcije ishoda je bila 0,727. Pri cut-off vrednosti od 2,80 senzitivnost je bila 75%, specifičnost 65% a OR 2,40 (95% CI 0,60–9,67). Pacijenti sa nivoom CD64 indeksa prvog dana višim od 2,80 imali su 2,4 puta veću verovatnoću smrtnog ishoda.

Zaključak: Vrednost CD64 indeksa prvog dana je dobar prediktor ishoda. AUC/ROC vrednosti za IL-6, CRP i LBP su bile < 0,55, pa se ovi biomarkeri nisu pokazali dobrim pre-diktorima ishoda.

Keywords: biomarkers; critical care; leukocytes; outcome; prognosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Receiver operator curve for the CD64 index levels on day 1.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Values of IL-6 from day 1 to day 3 according to outcome.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Values of CD64 index from day 1 to day 3 according to outcome.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Values of CRP from day 1 to day 3 according to outcome.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Values of LBP from day 1 to day 3 according to outcome.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Surbatovic M, Radakovic S, Jovanovic K, Romic P. New strategies in multiple organ dysfunction syndrome therapy for sepsis. Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2005;133(7–8):3791.83. - PubMed
    1. Surbatovic M, Grujic K, Cikota B, Jevtic M, Filipovic N, Romic P, et al. Polymorphisms of genes encoding tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-10, cluster of differentiation-14 and interleukin-1ra in critically ill patients. J Crit Care. 2010;25(3):542.e1–8. - PubMed
    1. Morris AC, Simpson AJ, Walsh TS. Hyperinflammation and mediators of immune suppression in critical illness. In: Vincent JL, editor. Annual update in intensive care and emergency medicine. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2013. pp. 135–44.
    1. Surbatovic M, Radakovic S. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha levels early in severe acute pancreatitis: is there predictive value regarding severity and outcome? J Clin Gastroenterol. 2013;47(7):637–43. - PubMed
    1. Surbatovic M, Filipovic N, Radakovic S, Stankovic N, Slavkovic Z. Immune cytokine response in combat casualties: blast or explosive trauma with or without secondary sepsis. Mil Med. 2007;172(2):190–5. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources