Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Mar 15;5(3):2325967117694818.
doi: 10.1177/2325967117694818. eCollection 2017 Mar.

Patient-Reported Outcomes After Multiligament Knee Injury: MCL Repair Versus Reconstruction

Jessica M Hanley  1 , Christopher A Anthony  1 , David DeMik  2 , Natalie Glass  1 , Annunziato Amendola  3 , Brian R Wolf  1 , Matthew Bollier  1
Affiliations

Patient-Reported Outcomes After Multiligament Knee Injury: MCL Repair Versus Reconstruction

Jessica M Hanley et al. Orthop J Sports Med. .

Abstract

Background: Management of the medial collateral ligament (MCL) in the setting of a multiligamentous knee injury (MLKI) represents an area of great controversy.

Purpose: Our study was designed to compare long-term patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after MCL repair versus reconstruction in the setting of a multiligamentous injury of the knee.

Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods: At a single institution, 68 patients were identified over a 10-year period as having MCL intervention in the setting of MLKI. Of these patients, 34 (50%) were successfully contacted via telephone to collect Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores. A retrospective chart review of these subjects was also conducted to identify patient and surgical factors affecting PROs.

Results: At a mean 6-year follow-up (range, 2-11 years), the mean Lysholm score was 77.4 ± 23.1 and mean IKDC score was 72.6 ± 23.6. Univariate analyses identified time to surgery (P = .005) and MCL reconstruction (P = .001) as risk factors for Lysholm score ≤75. Univariate analyses identified patient age (P = .049), time to surgery (P = .018), and MCL reconstruction (P = .004) as risk factors for IKDC score ≤75. On subsequent multivariate analysis, MCL reconstruction was found to be a predictor of Lysholm or IKDC score of ≤75.

Conclusion: Patients undergoing MCL repair in the setting of MLKI generally had higher PROs than those undergoing reconstructions at a mean 6 years of follow-up. Further work is needed to elucidate patient and surgical factors that may influence subjective outcomes after multiligament knee injuries.

Keywords: knee; medial collateral ligament; multiligament; outcomes; reconstruction; repair.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: B.R.W. is a consultant for ConMed Linvatec. M.B. is a consultant for Arthrex.

References

    1. Bin S, Nam T. Surgical outcome of 2-stage management of multiple knee ligament injuries after knee dislocation. Arthroscopy. 2007;23:1066–1072. - PubMed
    1. Burrus MT, Werner BC, Griffin JW, Gwathmey FW, Miller MD. Diagnostic and management strategies for multiligament knee injuries: a critical analysis review. JBJS Rev. 2016;4:e1–e1. doi:10.2106/JBJS.RVW.O.00020. - PubMed
    1. Carroll KM, Cvetanovich G, Heyworth BE, Van de Velde S, Gill TJ., 4th Approach to management of the patient with the multiligament-injured knee. Harvard Orthop J. 2013;15:54–64.
    1. Chahal J, Whelan DB, Jaglal SB, et al. The multiligament quality of life questionnaire: development and evaluation of test-retest reliability and validity in patients with multiligament knee injuries. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42:2906–2916. - PubMed
    1. DeLong JM, Waterman BR. Surgical techniques for the reconstruction of medial collateral ligament and posteromedial corner injuries of the knee: a systematic review. Arthroscopy. 2015;31:2258–2272.e1. - PubMed