Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2017 Oct;27(10):4426-4434.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-4802-3. Epub 2017 Mar 29.

Diagnostic performance of a CT-based scoring system for diagnosis of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy: comparison with subjective CT assessment

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Diagnostic performance of a CT-based scoring system for diagnosis of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy: comparison with subjective CT assessment

Lucas Goense et al. Eur Radiol. 2017 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: To develop a CT-based prediction score for anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy and compare it to subjective CT interpretation.

Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent a CT scan for a clinical suspicion of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy with cervical anastomosis between 2003 and 2014 were analyzed. The CT scans were systematically re-evaluated by two radiologists for the presence of specific CT findings and presence of an anastomotic leak. Also, the original CT interpretations were acquired. These results were compared to patients with and without a clinical confirmed leak.

Results: Out of 122 patients that underwent CT for a clinical suspicion of anastomotic leakage; 54 had a confirmed leak. In multivariable analysis, anastomotic leakage was associated with mediastinal fluid (OR = 3.4), esophagogastric wall discontinuity (OR = 4.9), mediastinal air (OR = 6.6), and a fistula (OR = 7.2). Based on these criteria, a prediction score was developed resulting in an area-under-the-curve (AUC) of 0.86, sensitivity of 80%, and specificity of 84%. The original interpretation and the systematic subjective CT assessment by two radiologists resulted in AUCs of 0.68 and 0.75 with sensitivities of 52% and 69%, and specificities of 84% and 82%, respectively.

Conclusion: This CT-based score may provide improved diagnostic performance for diagnosis of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy.

Key points: • A CT-based score provides improved diagnostic performance for diagnosis of anastomotic leakage. • Leakage associations include mediastinal fluid, mediastinal air, wall discontinuity, and fistula. • A scoring system yields superior diagnostic accuracy compared to subjective CT assessment. • Radiologists may suggest presence of anastomotic leakage based on a prediction score.

Keywords: Anastomotic leakage; Computed tomography; Esophageal cancer; Esophagectomy; Prediction score.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Guarantor

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Prof. R. van Hillegersberg.

Conflict of interest

The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

Funding

The authors state that this work has not received any funding.

Statistics and biometry

Two of the authors have significant statistical expertise.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board.

Methodology

• retrospective

• diagnostic

• observational

• performed at one institution

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart demonstrates the selection process of patients with a suspicion of anastomotic leakage (AL)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
ROC curve analysis of the ‘anastomotic leakage prediction score’ (green line), the systematic subjective CT assessment by expert radiologists (red dotted line) and the original interpretation (blue dotted line) indicating their ability to discriminate between patients with and without anastomotic leakage
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Examples of CT findings associated with the presence of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy. A: Image shows a fistula between the gastric tube and right pleural cavity (arrow). B: Image shows a fluid collection (arrow) in the mediastinum. C: Image shows a visible discontinuity of the esophagogastric wall (arrow). D: Image shows a mediastinal air cavity (arrow) after esophagectomy

References

    1. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65:87–108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262. - DOI - PubMed
    1. van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, van Lanschot JJ, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:2074–2084. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1112088. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shapiro J, van Lanschot JJ, Hulshof MC, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS): long-term results of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:1090–1098. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00040-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sjoquist KM, Burmeister BH, Smithers BM, et al. Survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for resectable oesophageal carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:681–692. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70142-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kim RH, Takabe K. Methods of esophagogastric anastomoses following esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review. J Surg Oncol. 2010;101:527–533. doi: 10.1002/jso.21510. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types