Changes in quality of life after elective surgery: an observational study comparing two measures
- PMID: 28357679
- PMCID: PMC6309881
- DOI: 10.1007/s11136-017-1560-2
Changes in quality of life after elective surgery: an observational study comparing two measures
Abstract
Purpose: Our main objective was to compare the change in a validated quality of life measure to a global assessment measure. The secondary objectives were to estimate the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) and to describe the change in quality of life by surgical specialty.
Methods: This prospective cohort study included 7902 adult patients undergoing elective surgery. Changes in the Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12), composed of a physical component summary (PCS) and a mental component summary (MCS), were calculated using preoperative and postoperative questionnaires. The latter also contained a global assessment question for quality of life. We compared PCS and MCS to the global assessment using descriptive statistics and weighted kappa. MCID was calculated using an anchor-based approach. Analyses were pre-specified and registered (NCT02771964).
Results: By the change in VR-12 scores, an equal proportion of patients experienced improvement and deterioration in quality of life (28% for PCS, 25% for MCS). In contrast, by the global assessment measure, 61% reported improvement, while only 10% reported deterioration. Agreement with the global assessment was slight for both PCS (kappa = 0.20, 57% matched) and MCS (kappa = 0.10, 54% matched). The MCID for the overall VR-12 score was approximately 2.5 points. Patients undergoing orthopedic surgery showed the most improvement in quality of life measures, while patients undergoing gastrointestinal/hepatobiliary or urologic surgery showed the most deterioration.
Conclusions: Subjective global quality of life report does not agree well with a validated quality of life instrument, perhaps due to patient over-optimism.
Keywords: Elective surgical procedures; Minimum clinically important difference (MCID); Outcome assessment; Patient-reported outcomes; Quality of life.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
References
-
- Urbach DR (2005). Measuring quality of life after surgery. Surgical Innovation, 12(2), 161–165. - PubMed
-
- Lohr KN, & Zebrack BJ (2009). Using patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: challenges and opportunities. Quality of Life Research, 18(1), 99–107. - PubMed
-
- Suk KS, Baek JH, Park JO, Kim HS, Lee HM, Kwon JW, et al. (2015). Postoperative quality of life in patients with progressive neuromuscular scoliosis and their parents. Spine J, 15(3), 446–453. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
