Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Dec;26(6):1197-1212.
doi: 10.1007/s10897-017-0095-6. Epub 2017 Mar 29.

Public's Views toward Return of Secondary Results in Genomic Sequencing: It's (Almost) All about the Choice

Affiliations

Public's Views toward Return of Secondary Results in Genomic Sequencing: It's (Almost) All about the Choice

Kerry A Ryan et al. J Genet Couns. 2017 Dec.

Abstract

The therapeutic use of genomic sequencing creates novel and unresolved questions about cost, clinical efficacy, access, and the disclosure of sequencing results. The disclosure of the secondary results of sequencing poses a particularly challenging ethical problem. Experts disagree about which results should be shared and public input - especially important for the creation of disclosure policies - is complicated by the complex nature of genetics. Recognizing the value of deliberative democratic methods for soliciting informed public opinion on matters like these, we recruited participants from a clinical research site for an all-day deliberative democracy (DD) session. Participants were introduced to the clinical and ethical issues associated with genomic sequencing, after which they discussed the tradeoffs and offered their opinions about policies for the return of secondary results. Participants (n = 66; mean age = 57 (SD = 15); 70% female; 76% white) were divided into 10 small groups (5 to 8 participants each) allowing interactive deliberation on policy options for the return of three categories of secondary results: 1) medically actionable results; 2) risks for adult-onset disorders identified in children; and 3) carrier status for autosomal recessive disorders. In our qualitative analysis of the session transcripts, we found that while participants favored choice and had a preference for making information available, they also acknowledged the risks (and benefits) of learning such information. Our research reveals the nuanced reasoning used by members of the public when weighing the pros and cons of receiving genomic information, enriching our understanding of the findings of surveys of attitudes regarding access to secondary results.

Keywords: Deliberative democracy; Disclosure of results; Ethics; Incidental findings; Participant preferences; Public policy; Qualitative analysis; Return of genomic results; Secondary results.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Kerry Ryan, Raymond De Vries, Wendy Uhlmann, J. Scott Roberts, and Michele Gornick declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. ACMG Board of Directors. ACMG policy statement: updated recommendations regarding analysis and reporting of secondary findings in clinical genome-scale sequencing. Genetics in medicine: official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics. 2015;17:68–69. doi: 10.1038/gim.2014.151. - DOI - PubMed
    1. American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Incidental findings in clinical genomics: a clarification. Genetics in medicine: official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics. 2013;15:664–666. doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.82. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Appelbaum PS, Fyer A, Klitzman RL, Martinez J, Parens E, Zhang Y, Chung WK. Researchers’ views on informed consent for return of secondary results in genomic research. Genetics in medicine: official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics. 2015;17:644–650. doi: 10.1038/gim.2014.163. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berg JS, Khoury MJ, Evans JP. Deploying whole genome sequencing in clinical practice and public health: meeting the challenge one bin at a time. Genetics in medicine: official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics. 2011;13:499–504. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e318220aaba. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bernhardt BA, Roche MI, Perry DL, Scollon SR, Tomlinson AN, Skinner D. Experiences with obtaining informed consent for genomic sequencing. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A. 2015;167A:2635–2646. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.37256. - DOI - PMC - PubMed