Tenth European Consensus Conference on Hyperbaric Medicine: recommendations for accepted and non-accepted clinical indications and practice of hyperbaric oxygen treatment
- PMID: 28357821
- PMCID: PMC6147240
- DOI: 10.28920/dhm47.1.24-32
Tenth European Consensus Conference on Hyperbaric Medicine: recommendations for accepted and non-accepted clinical indications and practice of hyperbaric oxygen treatment
Erratum in
-
Correction to Mathieu D, Marroni A, Kot J: Tenth European Consensus Conference on Hyperbaric Medicine: recommendations for accepted and non-accepted clinical indications and practice of hyperbaric oxygen treatment. Diving Hyperb Med. 2017 Mar;47(1):24-32.Diving Hyperb Med. 2017 Jun;47(2):131-132. doi: 10.28920/dhm47.2.131-132. Diving Hyperb Med. 2017. PMID: 28641327 Free PMC article.
Abstract
The tenth European Consensus Conference on Hyperbaric Medicine took place in April 2016, attended by a large delegation of experts from Europe and elsewhere. The focus of the meeting was the revision of the European Committee on Hyperbaric Medicine (ECHM) list of accepted indications for hyperbaric oxygen treatment (HBOT), based on a thorough review of the best available research and evidence-based medicine (EBM). For this scope, the modified GRADE system for evidence analysis, together with the DELPHI system for consensus evaluation, were adopted. The indications for HBOT, including those promulgated by the ECHM previously, were analysed by selected experts, based on an extensive review of the literature and of the available EBM studies. The indications were divided as follows: Type 1, where HBOT is strongly indicated as a primary treatment method, as it is supported by sufficiently strong evidence; Type 2, where HBOT is suggested as it is supported by acceptable levels of evidence; Type 3, where HBOT can be considered as a possible/optional measure, but it is not yet supported by sufficiently strong evidence. For each type, three levels of evidence were considered: A, when the number of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is considered sufficient; B, when there are some RCTs in favour of the indication and there is ample expert consensus; C, when the conditions do not allow for proper RCTs but there is ample and international expert consensus. For the first time, the conference also issued 'negative' recommendations for those conditions where there is Type 1 evidence that HBOT is not indicated. The conference also gave consensus-agreed recommendations for the standard of practice of HBOT.
Keywords: European Committee for Hyperbaric Medicine; Evidence; Medical conditions and problems; Symposium; Systematic review.
Conflict of interest statement
nil
Comment in
-
ECHM Consensus Conference and levels of evidence.Diving Hyperb Med. 2017 Jun;47(2):133. doi: 10.28920/dhm47.2.133. Diving Hyperb Med. 2017. PMID: 28641328 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Marroni A, Mathieu D, Wattel F. History, mission and achievements of the European Committee for Hyperbaric Medicine . The ECHM collection, volume 1 . In: Marroni A, Mathieu D, Wattel F, editors. Flagstaff, AZ: Best Publishing Company; 2005. p. xv-xxxvi.
-
- Marroni A, Mathieu D, Wattel F. First European Consensus Conference on Hyperbaric Medicine, Lille 2004 . The ECHM collection, volume 1 . In: Marroni A, Mathieu D, Wattel F, editors. Flagstaff, AZ: Best Publishing Company; 2005. p. 1.1-1.142.
-
- Marroni A, Mathieu D, Wattel F. The Seventh ECHM Consensus Conference: Lille, France, 2004 . The ECHM Collection, volume 3 . In: Marroni A, Mathieu D, Wattel F, editors. Flagstaff, AZ: Best Publishing Company; 2008. p. 1.1.3-1.5.290.
-
- Mathieu D, Marroni A, Kot J. Tenth European Consensus Conference on Hyperbaric Medicine: preliminary report. . Diving Hyperb Med. 2016;46:122–123. - PubMed
-
- Straus SE, Richardson WS, Glasziou P, Haynes RB, editors. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2010. Evidence-based medicine: how to practice and teach EBM, 4th edition .
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous