Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Mar 30;12(3):e0174657.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174657. eCollection 2017.

Frequency and clinical significance of short cervix in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes

Affiliations

Frequency and clinical significance of short cervix in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes

Seung Mi Lee et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Objective: Cervical length measurement has been uggested as a useful tool for predicting intra-amniotic infection/inflammation in preterm labor, but little information is available in the setting of preterm premature rupture of membranes (pPROM). We aimed to determine whether a short cervical length is independently associated with an increased risk of intra-amniotic infection or inflammation and impending preterm delivery in women with pPROM.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study involving 171 consecutive singleton pregnant women with pPROM (21+0-33+6 weeks' gestation), who underwent amniocentesis. Amniotic fluid (AF) was cultured, and assayed for interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-8. Cervical length was measured at the time of amniocentesis by transvaginal ultrasonography with an aseptic technique. Short cervical length was defined as a cervical length of ≤15 mm. Intra-amniotic infection was defined as a positive AF culture for microorganisms and intra-amniotic inflammation was defined as elevated AF concentrations of IL-6 or IL-8 (IL-6 ≥1.5 ng/mL and/or IL-8 ≥1.3 ng/mL).

Results: Fifty (29.2%) women had a sonographic cervical length of ≤15mm. On univariate analysis, short cervical length was associated with an increased risk for intra-amniotic infection and/or inflammation; no other parameters studied showed a significant association. Multivariable analyses indicated that short cervical length was significantly associated with a higher risk of impending preterm delivery (within 2 days of measurement, within 7 days of measurement, and before 34 weeks), and remained significant after adjustment for potential confounders.

Conclusion: In women with pPROM, short cervical length is associated with an increased risk for intra-amniotic infection/inflammation and associated with impending preterm delivery, independent of the presence of intra-amniotic infection/inflammation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Frequency of a short cervix and normal cervical length stratified by gestational age at measurement (P = 0.052 for χ2 test across 4 groups).
Closed columns represent a short cervix. Hash-marked columns represent normal cervical length.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Amniotic Fluid (AF) Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and AF IL-8 concentrations of the study population according to the presence or absence of a short cervix (AF IL-6: Median 3.123 ng/ml, interquartile range 0.569 to 16.181 ng/ml vs. median 0.734 ng/ml, interquartile range 0.378 to 4.096 ng/ml, P = 0.013; AF IL-8: Median 2.542 ng/ml, interquartile range 0.935 to 14.407 ng/ml vs. median 1.029 ng/ml, interquartile range 0.389 to 6.509 ng/ml, P = 0.005; respectively).
Fig 3
Fig 3. Kaplan-Meier estimates of measurement-to-delivery interval according to the results of cervical length assessed by ultrasound (using 15 mm as cut-off) in (A) total study population (median, 4.08 days [95% CI, 2.59–5.58] vs. 19.29 days [95% CI, 11.24–27.35]; P <0.001), (B) women without intra-amniotic infection/inflammation (median, 6.83 days [95% CI, 0.00–15.21] vs. 18.54 days [95% CI, 1.96–35.13]; P = 0.012), and (C) women with intra-amniotic infection/inflammation (median, 3.25 days [95% CI, 1.78–4.72] vs. 19.79 days [95% CI, 9.04–30.55]; P = 0.002).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF, Iams JD, Romero R. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet. 2008;371(9606):75–84. 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60074-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kaltreider DF, Kohl S. Epidemiology of preterm delivery. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1980;23(1):17–31. - PubMed
    1. Garite TJ, Freeman RK, Linzey EM, Braly P. The use of amniocentesis in patients with premature rupture of membranes. Obstet Gynecol. 1979;54(2):226–30. - PubMed
    1. Vintzileos AM, Campbell WA, Nochimson DJ, Weinbaum PJ, Escoto DT, Mirochnick MH. Qualitative amniotic fluid volume versus amniocentesis in predicting infection in preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Obstet Gynecol. 1986;67(4):579–83. - PubMed
    1. Gauthier DW, Meyer WJ, Bieniarz A. Correlation of amniotic fluid glucose concentration and intraamniotic infection in patients with preterm labor or premature rupture of membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;165(4 Pt 1):1105–10. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Supplementary concepts