Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Mar 30;6(4):e003989.
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003989.

Biomarker Profiles in Heart Failure Patients With Preserved and Reduced Ejection Fraction

Affiliations

Biomarker Profiles in Heart Failure Patients With Preserved and Reduced Ejection Fraction

Jasper Tromp et al. J Am Heart Assoc. .

Abstract

Background: Biomarkers may help us to unravel differences in the underlying pathophysiology between heart failure (HF) patients with a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Therefore, we compared biomarker profiles to characterize pathophysiological differences between patients with HFrEF and HFpEF.

Methods and results: We retrospectively analyzed 33 biomarkers from different pathophysiological domains (inflammation, oxidative stress, remodeling, cardiac stretch, angiogenesis, arteriosclerosis, and renal function) in 460 HF patients (21% HFpEF, left ventricular ejection fraction ≥45%) measured at discharge after hospitalization for acute HF. The association between these markers and the occurrence of all-cause mortality and/or HF-related rehospitalizations at 18 months was compared between patients with HFrEF and HFpEF. Patients were 70.6±11.4 years old and 37.4% were female. Patients with HFpEF were older, more often female, and had a higher systolic blood pressure. Levels of high-sensitive C-reactive protein were significantly higher in HFpEF, while levels of pro-atrial-type natriuretic peptide and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide were higher in HFrEF. Linear regression followed by network analyses revealed prominent inflammation and angiogenesis-associated interactions in HFpEF and mainly cardiac stretch-associated interactions in HFrEF. The angiogenesis-specific marker, neuropilin and the remodeling-specific marker, osteopontin were predictive for all-cause mortality and/or HF-related rehospitalizations at 18 months in HFpEF, but not in HFrEF (P for interaction <0.05).

Conclusions: In HFpEF, inflammation and angiogenesis-mediated interactions are predominantly observed, while stretch-mediated interactions are found in HFrEF. The remodeling marker osteopontin and the angiogenesis marker neuropilin predicted outcome in HFpEF, but not in HFrEF.

Keywords: biomarker; heart failure; multimarker; pathophysiology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Heatmaps depicting correlation between biomarkers in HFrEF (A) and HFpEF (B). Biomarker correlations that did not pass the corrected P‐value (0.05/21) are black. Red entails a negative correlation, green entails a positive correlation. BUN indicates blood urea nitrogen; CRP, C‐reactive protein; EPO, erythropoietin; ESAM, endothelial cell‐selective adhesion molecule; GDF‐15, growth differentiation factor 15; HFpEF, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; HFrEF, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; IL‐6, interleukin 6; MPO, myeloperoxidase; NGAL, neutrophil gelatinase‐associated lipocalin; NT‐proBNP, N‐terminal pro‐brain‐type natriuretic peptide; NT‐proCNP, amino terminal pro‐C‐type natriuretic peptide; PIGR, polymeric immunoglobulin receptor; proANP, pro‐atrial‐type natriuretic peptide; PSAP, prostate‐specific acid phosphatase; RAGE, receptor of advanced glycation end‐products; ST‐2, suppression of tumorigenicity 2; TGF‐β, transforming growth factor β; TNF‐α, tumor necrosis factor α; TNF‐α‐R1a, tumor necrosis factor α receptor 1a; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; VEGFR, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor; WAP4C, WAP 4 disulfide core domain protein.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Network analysis depicting associations between biomarkers in HFrEF (A) and HFpEF (B). Associations shown are those that passed the P‐value cutoff (0.05/21). Node size and color are based on the clustering coefficient. The edge betweenness was used as a criterion for the edges. BUN indicates blood urea nitrogen; CRP, C‐reactive protein; EPO, erythropoietin; ESAM, endothelial cell‐selective adhesion molecule; GDF‐15, growth differentiation factor 15; HFpEF, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; HFrEF, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; IL‐6, interleukin 6; MPO, myeloperoxidase; NGAL, neutrophil gelatinase‐associated lipocalin; NT‐proBNP, N‐terminal pro‐brain‐type natriuretic peptide; NT‐proCNP, amino terminal pro‐C‐type natriuretic peptide; PIGR, polymeric immunoglobulin receptor; proANP, pro‐atrial‐type natriuretic peptide; PSAP, prostate‐specific acid phosphatase; RAGE, receptor of advanced glycation end‐products; ST‐2, suppression of tumorigenicity 2; TGF‐β, transforming growth factor β; TNF‐α, tumor necrosis factor α; TNF‐α‐R1a, tumor necrosis factor α receptor 1a; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; VEGFR, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor; WAP4C, WAP 4 disulfide core domain protein.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan–Meier curves depicting the relationship with outcome of osteopontin in tertiles, stratified to HFrEF and HFpEF. HFpEF indicates heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; HFrEF, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Kaplan–Meier curves depicting the relationship with outcome of neuropilin in tertiles, stratified to HFrEF and HFpEF. HFpEF indicates heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; HFrEF, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Owan TE, Hodge DO, Herges RM, Jacobsen SJ, Roger VL, Redfield MM. Trends in prevalence and outcome of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:251–259. - PubMed
    1. van Veldhuisen DJ, Cohen‐Solal A, Böhm M, Anker SD, Babalis D, Roughton M, Coats AJS, Poole‐Wilson PA, Flather MD. Beta‐blockade with nebivolol in elderly heart failure patients with impaired and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: data from SENIORS (Study of Effects of Nebivolol Intervention on Outcomes and Rehospitalization in Seniors With Heart Failure). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:2150–2158. - PubMed
    1. Yusuf S, Pfeffer MA, Swedberg K, Granger CB, Held P, McMurray JJ, Michelson EL, Olofsson B, Ostergren J; Committees CI . Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and preserved left‐ventricular ejection fraction: the CHARM‐Preserved Trial. Lancet. 2003;362:777–781. - PubMed
    1. Pitt B, Pfeffer MA, Assmann SF, Boineau R, Anand IS, Claggett B, Clausell N, Desai AS, Diaz R, Fleg JL, Gordeev I, Harty B, Heitner JF, Kenwood CT, Lewis EF, O'Meara E, Probstfield JL, Shaburishvili T, Shah SJ, Solomon SD, Sweitzer NK, Yang S, McKinlay SM; Investigators T . Spironolactone for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1383–1392. - PubMed
    1. Braunwald E. Biomarkers in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2148–2159. - PubMed

MeSH terms