Clinical Characteristics and Response to Long-Term Botulinum Toxin Type A Therapy in Patients with Cervical Dystonia at a Neurology Clinic
- PMID: 28360658
- PMCID: PMC5353174
- DOI: 10.5152/npa.2014.7026
Clinical Characteristics and Response to Long-Term Botulinum Toxin Type A Therapy in Patients with Cervical Dystonia at a Neurology Clinic
Abstract
Introduction: To determine the demographic and clinical characteristics and response to botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) therapy in patients with cervical dystonia (CD).
Method: A retrospective analysis of the detailed medical records of the patients with CD, followed up at our Botulinum Toxin Outpatient Clinic from 1998 to 2012, was performed. The treatment data were compared between the patients with primary CD and those with secondary CD; between patients receiving BoNT-A treatment for more than 5 years and less than five years, and between first applications and last applications.
Results: Fifty-seven patients (56.15% women) with CD were included in this study. The mean age was 41.01±13.42 years, the mean age at symptom onset was 32.93±15.45 years, and the mean dystonia duration was 8.10±8.5 years. The interval between onset of symptom and first BoNT-A treatment was 5.94±9.06 years, the duration of BoNT-A treatment was 36.13±29.17 months, and the number of applications was 8.48±6.23 in 45 patients with CD who were under treatment with BoNT-A for more than 1 year and had received at least three injections before. There was no difference between the patients with primary and secondary CD in terms of treatment results. The injection interval of the patients receiving BoNT-A treatment for more than 5 years and less than 5 years was 18.37±5.10 and 14.43±2.36 weeks, respectively (p=.001). There were no differences in the other treatment values. The mean doses were 559.00±147.60 vs. 681.66±188.09 units (p=.0001), the durations of improvement were 11.82±2.71 vs. 13.00±4.00 weeks (p=.014), the response scores were 2.71±.3 vs. 3.02±.5 (p=.002), the response ratings were 64.66%±16.18 vs. 71.22%±17.29 (p=.001), and the numbers of muscles applied were 3.15±1.16 vs. 3.51±0.99 (p=.012) in the first and last applications, respectively.
Conclusion: There were no differences between the response of the patients with primary and secondary CD. Our results showed a statistically significant increase in the mean dose of BoNT-A, the response rating, the number of muscles applied, the duration of improvement, and the injection interval over time.
Keywords: Cervical dystonia; botulinum toxin; clinical characteristics; clinical findings; demographic characteristics.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest: The authors reported no conflict of interest related to this article.
Similar articles
-
Lessons about Botulinum Toxin A Therapy from Cervical Dystonia Patients Drawing the Course of Disease: A Pilot Study.Toxins (Basel). 2023 Jun 30;15(7):431. doi: 10.3390/toxins15070431. Toxins (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37505701 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of the initial severity on later outcome: retrospective analysis of a large cohort of botulinum toxin naïve patients with idiopathic cervical dystonia.J Neurol. 2021 Jan;268(1):206-213. doi: 10.1007/s00415-020-10128-7. Epub 2020 Aug 5. J Neurol. 2021. PMID: 32761340 Free PMC article.
-
Quality of life in long-term botulinum toxin treatment of cervical dystonia: Results of a cross sectional study.Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2018 Dec;57:63-67. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2018.07.019. Epub 2018 Jul 31. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2018. PMID: 30150129
-
Duration of botulinum toxin efficacy in cervical dystonia clinical trials: A scoping review.Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2024 Aug;125:107011. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2024.107011. Epub 2024 May 29. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2024. PMID: 38909588
-
Botulinum toxin therapy for cervical dystonia.Neurotox Res. 2006 Apr;9(2-3):145-8. doi: 10.1007/BF03033933. Neurotox Res. 2006. PMID: 16785112 Review.
Cited by
-
Doses of Botulinum Toxin in Cervical Dystonia: Does Ultrasound Guidance Change Injection Practices?Toxins (Basel). 2024 Oct 11;16(10):439. doi: 10.3390/toxins16100439. Toxins (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39453215 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Jankovic J, Leder S, Warner D, Schwartz K. Cervical dystonia: clinical findings and associated movement disorders. Neurology. 1991;41:1088–1091. http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.41.7.1088. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Chan J, Brin MF, Fahn S. Idiopathic cervical dystonia: clinical characteristics. Mov Disord. 1991;6:119–126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mds.870060206. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Fahn S, Marsden CD, Calne DB. Classification and investigation of dystonia. In: Marsden CD, Fahn S, editors. Movement Disorders içinde. 2. Baskı. London: Butteworths; 1987. pp. 332–358.
-
- Jankovic J, Tsui J, Bergeron C. Prevalence of cervical dystonia and spasmodic torticollis in the United States general population. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2007;13:411–416. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2007.02.005. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Nutt JG, Muenter MD, Aronson A, Kurland LT, Melton LJ., 3rd Epidemiology of focal and generalized dystonia in Rochester, Minnesota. Mov Disord. 1988;3:188–194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mds.870030302. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources