Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Mar;52(1):89-94.
doi: 10.5152/npa.2015.7169. Epub 2015 Mar 1.

Reliability and Validity Study of the Turkish Version of the Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale

Affiliations

Reliability and Validity Study of the Turkish Version of the Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale

A Ender Altintoprak et al. Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2015 Mar.

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of the present study was to perform reliability and validity analyses of the Turkish version of the Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale which is used to determine the severity of opiate withdrawal.

Methods: Initially, the Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS) was translated into Turkish and subsequently back-translated into English. The originality of the back-translated version was approved by the author who developed the scale. After the translation was completed, the scale was used to assess the withdrawal symptoms of 100 patients with opiate withdrawal and 41 patients with alcohol withdrawal. Cronbach's alpha was used in the reliability assessment; explanatory and confirmatory factor analyses were used in structural validity assessment; and in scale validity, ROC analysis was used among diagnosis groups.

Results: The Cronbach's alpha internal consistency coefficient was calculated as 0.74 in reliability analyses. The correlation coefficient was found to be 0.975 (p<0.001) for inter-rater reliability. Factor analysis was conducted for the structural validity of the scale and findings that support the unidimensional structure of the scale were observed. In the confirmatory factor analysis, CFI, GFI and RMSEA values were found to be 0.905, 0.905 and 0.079, respectively. It was detected that COWS was successful in distinguishing between opiate and alcohol withdrawal symptoms and the area under the ROC curve was 0.878.

Conclusion: This study showed that the Turkish version of COWS can be used reliably and validly for assessing opiate withdrawal.

Keywords: COWS; Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale; opiate withdrawal; reliability; validity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: The authors declared no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Sensitivity and specificity of the COWS COWS: Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wesson DR, Ling W. The clinical opiate withdrawal scale (COWS) J Psychoactive Drugs. 2003;35:253–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2003.10400007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Köroğlu Hekimler Yayın Birliği E, translator and editor. Mental Bozuklukların Tanısal ve Sayımsal El Kitabı, Amerikan Psikiyatri Birliği. Dördüncü Baskı (DSM-IV) Ankara: 1994. 1995.
    1. Tompkins AD, Bigelow GE, Harrison JA, Johnson RE, Fudala PJ, Strain EC. Concurrent validation of the Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS) and single-item indices against the Clinical Institute Narcotic Assessment (CINA) opiate withdrawal instrument. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009;105:154–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.07.001. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bradley BP, Gossop M, Phillips GT, Legarda JJ. The development of an opiate withdrawal scale (OWS) Br J Addict. 1987;82:1139–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.1987.tb03294.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Handelsman L, Cochrane KJ, Aronson MJ, Ness R, Rubinstein KJ, Kanof PD. Two new rating scales for opiate withdrawal. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1987;13:293–308. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00952998709001515. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources