Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Jun;29(3):266-271.
doi: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000497.

Implementation strategies in pediatric neurocritical care

Affiliations
Review

Implementation strategies in pediatric neurocritical care

Christopher Markham et al. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2017 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose of review: Brain-directed critical care for children is a relatively new area of subspecialization in pediatric critical care. Pediatric neurocritical care teams combine the expertise of neurology, neurosurgery, and critical care medicine. The positive impact of delivering specialized care to pediatric patients with acute neurological illness is becoming more apparent, but the optimum way to implement and sustain the delivery of this is complicated and poorly understood. We aim to provide emerging evidence supporting that effective implementation of pediatric neurocritical care pathways can improve patient survival and outcomes. We also provide an overview of the most effective strategies across the field of implementation science that can facilitate deployment of neurocritical care pathways in the pediatric ICU.

Recent findings: Implementation strategies can broadly be grouped according to six categories: planning, educating, restructuring, financing, managing quality, and attending to the policy context. Using a combination of these strategies in the last decade, several institutions have improved patient morbidity and mortality. Although much work remains to be done, emerging evidence supports that implementation of evidence-based care pathways for critically ill children with two common neurological diagnoses - status epilepticus and traumatic brain injury - improves outcomes.

Summary: Pediatric and neonatal neurocritical care programs that support evidence-based care can be effectively structured using appropriately sequenced implementation strategies to improve outcomes across a variety of patient populations and in a variety of healthcare settings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: None

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A concise summary of the compilation of over 205 implementation strategies. (reproduced with permission from [20] Powell et al MCRR. 2012;69(2):123–57).

References

    1. Wainwright MS, Hansen G, Piantino J. Pediatric neurocritical care in the 21st century: from empiricism to evidence. Current opinion in critical care. 2016;22(2):106–12. - PubMed
    1. Bell MJ, Carpenter J, Au AK, Keating RF, Myseros JS, Yaun A, et al. Development of a pediatric neurocritical care service. Neurocritical care. 2009;10(1):4–10. - PubMed
    1. Cappell J, Kernie SG. Advances in pediatric neurocritical care. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2013;60(3):709–24. - PubMed
    1. LaRovere KL, Graham RJ, Tasker RC Pediatric Critical Nervous System P. Pediatric neurocritical care: a neurology consultation model and implication for education and training. Pediatric neurology. 2013;48(3):206–11. - PubMed
    1. Murphy SA, Bell MJ, Clark ME, Whalen MJ, Noviski N. Pediatric Neurocritical Care: A Short Survey of Current Perceptions and Practices. Neurocritical care. 2015;23(2):149–58. - PubMed