Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2017 Jun;7(6):610-619.
doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-16-0795. Epub 2017 Mar 31.

A Phase Ib Dose-Escalation Study of Encorafenib and Cetuximab with or without Alpelisib in Metastatic BRAF-Mutant Colorectal Cancer

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

A Phase Ib Dose-Escalation Study of Encorafenib and Cetuximab with or without Alpelisib in Metastatic BRAF-Mutant Colorectal Cancer

Robin M J M van Geel et al. Cancer Discov. 2017 Jun.

Abstract

Preclinical evidence suggests that concomitant BRAF and EGFR inhibition leads to sustained suppression of MAPK signaling and suppressed tumor growth in BRAFV600E colorectal cancer models. Patients with refractory BRAFV600-mutant metastatic CRC (mCRC) were treated with a selective RAF kinase inhibitor (encorafenib) plus a monoclonal antibody targeting EGFR (cetuximab), with (n = 28) or without (n = 26) a PI3Kα inhibitor (alpelisib). The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or a recommended phase II dose. Dose-limiting toxicities were reported in 3 patients receiving dual treatment and 2 patients receiving triple treatment. The MTD was not reached for either group and the phase II doses were selected as 200 mg encorafenib (both groups) and 300 mg alpelisib. Combinations of cetuximab and encorafenib showed promising clinical activity and tolerability in patients with BRAF-mutant mCRC; confirmed overall response rates of 19% and 18% were observed and median progression-free survival was 3.7 and 4.2 months for the dual- and triple-therapy groups, respectively.Significance: Herein, we demonstrate that dual- (encorafenib plus cetuximab) and triple- (encorafenib plus cetuximab and alpelisib) combination treatments are tolerable and provide promising clinical activity in the difficult-to-treat patient population with BRAF-mutant mCRC. Cancer Discov; 7(6); 610-9. ©2017 AACR.See related commentary by Sundar et al., p. 558This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 539.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

JT reports compensation for an advisory role from Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Chugai, Lilly, MSD, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Symphogen, Takeda and Taiho. MS reports compensation for advisory boards from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Novartis; compensation for CME presentations from Alexion, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi and research grants (to institution) from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis. TY reports research grants (to institution) from Daiichi Sankyo, Taiho, Bayer Yakuhin, Lilly, Pfizer, Yakult Honsha, Chugai, Dainippon Sumitomo; personal fees from Merck Serono, Chugai, Takeda. ML reports research grants (to institution) from Astellas, Johnson & Johnson and Sanofi. JEF reports current employment with Novartis and personal fees from N-of-One Therapeutics, Merrimack Pharmaceuticals. SS reports research grants (to institution) from Novartis and compensation for an advisory role from Novartis. RY reports research grants (to institution) from Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, Genentech and compensation for advisory boards from GlaxoSmithKline. ZW reports research grants (to institution) from Novartis. EA, AC, SJ, ET and TD report employment with Novartis. KM reports employment with Array BioPharma Inc. RVG, EE, JCB, AS, J-PD, YY, FE, H-J L and JHMS have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Waterfall plot of best percentage change of tumor size from baseline by best response
Data cutoff date: February 1, 2015. *Patients treated at the RP2D; Abbreviations: CR, complete response; DCR, disease control rate; ENC + ALP + CTX, encorafenib combined with alpelisib and cetuximab; ENC + CTX, encorafenib combined with cetuximab; ORR, overall response rate; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial response; RECIST, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; RP2D, recommended phase 2 dose; SD, stable disease.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Progression-free survival for all patients
Abbreviations: ENC + ALP + CTX, encorafenib combined with alpelisib and cetuximab; ENC + CTX, encorafenib combined with cetuximab; PFS, progression-free survival. The two cohorts were recruited sequentially.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Progression-free survival vs genetic alterations and allele frequency by gene pathways
Abbreviations: APC, adenomatous polyposis coli; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; ENC + ALP + CTX, encorafenib combined with alpelisib and cetuximab; ENC + CTX, encorafenib combined with cetuximab; KRAS, Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog; LOH1, copy-loss loss of heterozygosity; LOHx, copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; MET, MET proto-oncogene, receptor tyrosine kinase; PI3K, phosphoinositide 3-kinase; PTEN, phosphatase and tensin homolog; RNF43, ring finger protein 43; RTK, receptor tyrosine kinase.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2015;65(2):87–108. - PubMed
    1. Chappell WH, Steelman LS, Long JM, Kempf RC, Abrams SL, Franklin RA, et al. Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK and PI3K/PTEN/Akt/mTOR inhibitors: rationale and importance to inhibiting these pathways in human health. Oncotarget. 2011 Mar;2(3):135–64. - PMC - PubMed
    1. De Roock W, Biesmans B, De Schutter J, Tejpar S. Clinical biomarkers in oncology: focus on colorectal cancer. Mol Diagn Ther. 2009;13(2):103–14. - PubMed
    1. Rizzo S, Bronte G, Fanale D, Corsini L, Silvestris N, Santini D, et al. Prognostic vs predictive molecular biomarkers in colorectal cancer: is KRAS and BRAF wild type status required for anti-EGFR therapy? Cancer Treat Rev. 2010 Nov;36( Suppl 3):S56–61. - PubMed
    1. Tejpar S, Bertagnolli M, Bosman F, Lenz HJ, Garraway L, Waldman F, et al. Prognostic and predictive biomarkers in resected colon cancer: current status and future perspectives for integrating genomics into biomarker discovery. Oncologist. 2010;15(4):390–404. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms