Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 May;20(2):46-52.
doi: 10.1136/eb-2017-102666. Epub 2017 Mar 31.

Reporting guidance considerations from a statistical perspective: overview of tools to enhance the rigour of reporting of randomised trials and systematic reviews

Affiliations
Review

Reporting guidance considerations from a statistical perspective: overview of tools to enhance the rigour of reporting of randomised trials and systematic reviews

Brian Hutton et al. Evid Based Ment Health. 2017 May.

Abstract

Objective: Research waste has received considerable attention from the biomedical community. One noteworthy contributor is incomplete reporting in research publications. When detailing statistical methods and results, ensuring analytic methods and findings are completely documented improves transparency. For publications describing randomised trials and systematic reviews, guidelines have been developed to facilitate complete reporting. This overview summarises aspects of statistical reporting in trials and systematic reviews of health interventions.

Methods: A narrative approach to summarise features regarding statistical methods and findings from reporting guidelines for trials and reviews was taken. We aim to enhance familiarity of statistical details that should be reported in biomedical research among statisticians and their collaborators.

Results: We summarise statistical reporting considerations for trials and systematic reviews from guidance documents including the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) Statement for reporting of trials, the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) Statement for trial protocols, the Statistical Analyses and Methods in the Published Literature (SAMPL) Guidelines for statistical reporting principles, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement for systematic reviews and PRISMA for Protocols (PRISMA-P). Considerations regarding sharing of study data and statistical code are also addressed.

Conclusions: Reporting guidelines provide researchers with minimum criteria for reporting. If followed, they can enhance research transparency and contribute improve quality of biomedical publications. Authors should employ these tools for planning and reporting of their research.

Keywords: STATISTICS & RESEARCH METHODS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared. doi:10.1136/eb-2017-102666

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chalmers I, Glasziou P. Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:1341–5. 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c3020d - DOI - PubMed
    1. Glasziou P, Altman DG, Bossuyt P, et al. . Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research. Lancet Lond Engl 2014;383:267–76. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62228-X - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chan AW, Song F, Vickers A, et al. . Increasing value and reducing waste: addressing inaccessible research. Lancet Lond Engl 2014;383:257–66. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62296-5 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goodman SN, Fanelli D, Ioannidis JPA. What does research reproducibility mean? Sci Transl Med 2016;8:341ps12. 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf5027 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Turner L, Shamseer L, Altman DG, et al. . Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;11:MR000030. 10.1002/14651858.MR000030.pub2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed