Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2017 Apr;5(7):e13240.
doi: 10.14814/phy2.13240.

Case report: acute facial swelling in a recreational technical diver

Affiliations
Case Reports

Case report: acute facial swelling in a recreational technical diver

Peter Buzzacott et al. Physiol Rep. 2017 Apr.

Abstract

A recreational scuba diver wore a second scuba regulator against his face during a scuba dive, attached by an elastic rubber cord necklace. After surfacing, the diver's left face became swollen. Through a process of elimination all other items of scuba equipment were excluded as potential causes. A dive with the same equipment minus the necklace confirmed the involvement of the necklace in the pathogenesis of the hypersensitive reaction. In vitro ImmunoCap IgE assay was positive to latex (1.30 kUa/L), subsequent patch testing for contact dermatitis provoked a reaction for benzophenone-4, (a UV stabalizer) and Fourier Transform Infra Red spectroscopy identified the elastic as ethylene propylene rubber, containing additional unidentified compounds. Allergy to natural rubber latex occurs in as many as 6% of Americans and Australians. Around three million American residents are thought to scuba dive each year. Recreational divers are, therefore, advised to check such necklaces, which are typically worn around the throat, for frayed ends and exposed rubber filaments.

Keywords: Allergy; immunology; latex; rubber; scuba.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Progression of facial swelling.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The necklace made of shock‐cord, with frayed end detail.

Similar articles

References

    1. Bergendorff, O. , and Hansson C.. 2007. Contact dermatitis to a rubber allergen with both dithiocarbamate and benzothiazole structure. Contact Dermatitis. 56:278–280. - PubMed
    1. Burkhart, C. , Schloemer J., and Zirwas M.. 2015. Differentiation of latex allergy from irritant contact dermatitis. Cutis 96(369–71):401. - PubMed
    1. Sports and Fitness Industry Association . 2015. Participation in recreational diving report. Silver Spring, MD: Sports and Fitness Industry Association, Silver Spring, MD.
    1. Turner, S. , McNamee R., Agius R., Wilkinson S. M., Carder M., and Stocks S. J.. 2012. Evaluating interventions aimed at reducing occupational exposure to latex and rubber glove allergens. Occup. Environ. Med. 69:925–931. - PubMed
    1. Wu, M. , McIntosh J., and Liu J.. 2016. Current prevalence rate of latex allergy: why it remains a problem? J. Occup. Health. 58:138–144. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources