Diagnostic Performance of Resting and Hyperemic Invasive Physiological Indices to Define Myocardial Ischemia: Validation With 13N-Ammonia Positron Emission Tomography
- PMID: 28365268
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.12.015
Diagnostic Performance of Resting and Hyperemic Invasive Physiological Indices to Define Myocardial Ischemia: Validation With 13N-Ammonia Positron Emission Tomography
Abstract
Objectives: The authors sought to compare the diagnostic performance of fractional flow reserve (FFR), instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), and resting distal coronary artery pressure/aortic pressure (Pd/Pa) using 13N-ammonia positron emission tomography (PET).
Background: The diagnostic performance of invasive physiological indices was reported to be different according to the reference to define the presence of myocardial ischemia.
Methods: A total of 115 consecutive patients with left anterior descending artery stenosis who underwent both 13N-ammonia PET and invasive physiological measurement were included. Optimal cutoff values and diagnostic performance of FFR, iFR, and resting Pd/Pa were assessed using PET-derived coronary flow reserve (CFR) and relative flow reserve (RFR) as references. To compare discrimination and reclassification ability, each index was compared with integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) and category-free net reclassification index (NRI).
Results: All invasive physiological indices correlated with CFR and RFR (all p values <0.001). The overall diagnostic accuracies of FFR, iFR, and resting Pd/Pa were not different for CFR <2.0 (FFR 69.6%, iFR 73.9%, and resting Pd/Pa 70.4%) and RFR <0.75 (FFR 73.9%, iFR 71.3%, and resting Pd/Pa 74.8%). Discrimination and reclassification abilities of invasive physiological indices were comparable for CFR. For RFR, FFR showed better discrimination and reclassification ability than resting indices (IDI = 0.170 and category-free NRI = 0.971 for iFR; IDI = 0.183 and category-free NRI = 1.058 for resting Pd/Pa; all p values <0.001).
Conclusions: The diagnostic performance of invasive physiological indices showed no differences in the prediction of myocardial ischemia defined by CFR. Using RFR as a reference, FFR showed a better discrimination and reclassification ability than resting indices.
Keywords: (13)N-ammonia positron emission tomography; coronary artery disease; fractional flow reserve; instantaneous wave-free ratio; myocardial ischemia.
Copyright © 2017 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Resting Versus Hyperemic Coronary Pressure Measurements for Stenosis Evaluation: The New Kids Have Come to Stay.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Apr 24;10(8):761-763. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.01.046. Epub 2017 Mar 29. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017. PMID: 28365262 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
