Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2017 Oct;15(10):1580-1588.e3.
doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.03.031. Epub 2017 Mar 30.

Improved Long-term Outcomes of Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease Receiving Proactive Compared With Reactive Monitoring of Serum Concentrations of Infliximab

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Improved Long-term Outcomes of Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease Receiving Proactive Compared With Reactive Monitoring of Serum Concentrations of Infliximab

Konstantinos Papamichael et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Oct.

Abstract

Background & aims: Monitoring serum concentrations of tumor necrosis factor antagonists in patients receiving these drugs as treatment for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), also called therapeutic drug monitoring, is performed either after patient loss of response (reactive drug monitoring) or in patients in clinical remission in which the drug is titrated to a target concentration (proactive drug monitoring). We compared long-term outcomes of patients with IBD undergoing proactive vs reactive monitoring of serum concentrations of infliximab.

Methods: We performed a multicenter, retrospective study of 264 consecutive patients with IBD (167 with Crohn's disease) receiving infliximab maintenance therapy. The subjects received proactive (n = 130) or reactive (n = 134) drug monitoring, based on measurements of first infliximab concentration and antibodies to infliximab, from September 2006 to January 2015; they were followed through December 2015 (median time of 2.4 years). We analyzed time to treatment failure, first IBD-related surgery or hospitalization, serious infusion reaction, and detection of antibodies to infliximab. Treatment failure was defined as drug discontinuation for loss of response or serious adverse event, or need for surgery.

Results: Multiple Cox regression analysis independently associated proactive drug monitoring, compared with reactive monitoring, with reduced risk for treatment failure (hazard ratio [HR], 0.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.09-0.27; P < .001), IBD-related surgery (HR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.11-0.80; P = .017), IBD-related hospitalization (HR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.07-0.33; P < .001), antibodies to infliximab (HR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.07-0.84; P = .025), and serious infusion reaction (HR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.04-0.78; P = .023).

Conclusions: In a retrospective analysis of patients with IBD receiving proactive vs reactive monitoring of serum concentration of infliximab, proactive monitoring was associated with better clinical outcomes, including greater drug durability, less need for IBD-related surgery or hospitalization, and lower risk of antibodies to infliximab or serious infusion reactions.

Keywords: CD; Immunogenicity; Monitoring Therapy; Ulcerative Colitis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest

The authors disclose the following: Byron P. Vaughn receives research support from Takeda and Genentech and has received compensation from Janssen and AbbVie for speaking and advisory boards. Mark T. Osterman received consultancy fees from Janssen, AbbVie, UCB, Takeda, Pfizer, and Lycera, and received research grant support from UCB. Adam S. Cheifetz received consultancy fees from AbbVie, Janssen, UCB, Takeda, Prometheus, and Pfizer. The remaining authors disclose no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of study population. IBD, inflammatory bowel disease; IFX, infliximab; IPAA, ileal pouch-anal anastomosis; TDM, therapeutic drug monitoring.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan-Meier cumulative probability curves of treatment failure in patients undergoing either reactive (dotted line) or proactive therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) (solid line) based on the first infliximab (IFX) concentration measured (A), stratified also by the type of IBD, Crohn’s disease (B) or ulcerative colitis (C).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Treatment failure (A), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)–related surgery (B), IBD-related hospitalization (C), antibodies to infliximab (D), and serious infusion reaction (E) by infliximab trough concentration quartiles at start of therapeutic drug monitoring.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Kaplan-Meier cumulative probability curves of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)–related surgery (A), IBD-related hospitalization (B), detectable antibodies to infliximab (IFX) (C), and serious infusion reaction (D) in patients undergoing either reactive (dotted line) or proactive therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) (solid line) based on the first IFX concentration measured.

Comment in

References

    1. Osterman MT, Haynes K, Delzell E, et al. Comparative effectiveness of infliximab and adalimumab for Crohn’s disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;12:811–817. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ben-Horin S, Chowers Y. Loss of response to anti-TNF treatments in Crohn’s disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011;33:987–995. - PubMed
    1. Papamichael K, Cheifetz AS. Use of anti-TNF drug concentrations to optimise patient management. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2016;7:289–300. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vaughn BP, Sandborn WJ, Cheifetz AS. Biologic concentration testing in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2015;21:1435–1442. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nanda KS, Cheifetz AS, Moss AC. Impact of antibodies to infliximab on clinical outcomes and serum infliximab concentrations in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD): a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108:40–47. - PMC - PubMed