A retrospective cephalometric investigation of two fixed functional orthodontic appliances in class II treatment: Functional Mandibular Advancer vs. Herbst appliance
- PMID: 28365810
- DOI: 10.1007/s00784-017-2111-5
A retrospective cephalometric investigation of two fixed functional orthodontic appliances in class II treatment: Functional Mandibular Advancer vs. Herbst appliance
Abstract
Objective: The objective of the study is to compare skeletal and dental changes in class II patients treated with fixed functional appliances (FFA) that pursue different biomechanical concepts: (1) FMA (Functional Mandibular Advancer) from first maxillary molar to first mandibular molar through inclined planes and (2) Herbst appliance from first maxillary molar to lower first bicuspid through a rod-and-tube mechanism.
Materials and methods: Forty-two equally distributed patients were treated with FMA (21) and Herbst appliance (21), following a single-step advancement protocol. Lateral cephalograms were available before treatment and immediately after removal of the FFA. The lateral cephalograms were analyzed with customized linear measurements. The actual therapeutic effect was then calculated through comparison with data from a growth survey. Additionally, the ratio of skeletal and dental contributions to molar and overjet correction for both FFA was calculated. Data was analyzed by means of one-sample Student's t tests and independent Student's t tests. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
Results: Although differences between FMA and Herbst appliance were found, intergroup comparisons showed no statistically significant differences. Almost all measurements resulted in comparable changes for both appliances. Statistically significant dental changes occurred with both appliances. Dentoalveolar contribution to the treatment effect was ≥70%, thus always resulting in ≤30% for skeletal alterations.
Conclusion: FMA and Herbst appliance usage results in comparable skeletal and dental treatment effects despite different biomechanical approaches.
Clinical relevance: Treatment leads to overjet and molar relationship correction that is mainly caused by significant dentoalveolar changes.
Keywords: Biomechanics; Cephalometrics; FMA; Herbst appliance; Treatment effects.
Similar articles
-
Soft tissue profile changes after Functional Mandibular Advancer or Herbst appliance treatment in class II patients.Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Mar;22(2):971-980. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2177-0. Epub 2017 Jul 18. Clin Oral Investig. 2018. PMID: 28721528
-
Cephalometric study of Class II Division 1 patients treated with an extended-duration, reinforced, banded Herbst appliance followed by fixed appliances.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Nov;150(5):818-830. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.04.020. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016. PMID: 27871709
-
Changes of epiglottis and hyoid bone position after orthodontic treatment with cast splint fixed functional appliances.Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Mar;25(3):1525-1534. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03460-9. Epub 2021 Jan 6. Clin Oral Investig. 2021. PMID: 33409688
-
Comparison of Twin Block appliance and Herbst appliance in the treatment of Class II malocclusion among children: a meta-analysis.BMC Oral Health. 2024 Feb 26;24(1):278. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04027-w. BMC Oral Health. 2024. PMID: 38409017 Free PMC article.
-
Mandibular propulsion appliance for adults with Class II malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur J Orthod. 2020 Apr 1;42(2):163-173. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjz089. Eur J Orthod. 2020. PMID: 31786599
Cited by
-
Comparison of surgical and non-surgical orthodontic treatment approaches on occlusal and cephalometric outcomes in patients with Class II Division I malocclusions.Prog Orthod. 2017 Dec;18(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s40510-017-0171-3. Epub 2017 Jul 3. Prog Orthod. 2017. PMID: 28580542 Free PMC article.
-
Mandibular fossa morphology during therapy with a fixed functional orthodontic appliance : A magnetic resonance imaging study.J Orofac Orthop. 2018 Mar;79(2):116-132. doi: 10.1007/s00056-018-0124-6. Epub 2018 Feb 20. J Orofac Orthop. 2018. PMID: 29464288 English.
-
Outcome differences after orthodontic camouflage treatment in hypo- and hyperdivergent patients - A retrospective cephalometric investigation.Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Dec;27(12):7307-7318. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05321-7. Epub 2023 Nov 13. Clin Oral Investig. 2023. PMID: 37953326 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of Functional Mandibular Advancer in Patients with Class II Malocclusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Turk J Orthod. 2023 Dec 29;36(4):270-279. doi: 10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2022.2022.110. Turk J Orthod. 2023. PMID: 38164015 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of factors that influence the success rate of OSA treatment with a customised adjustable MAD device - a retrospective study.Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2020 Aug;40(4):297-303. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-N0307. Epub 2020 Jun 10. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2020. PMID: 32519991 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources