Adult Scandinavians' use of powered scooters: user satisfaction, frequency of use, and prediction of daily use
- PMID: 28366104
- DOI: 10.1080/17483107.2017.1306589
Adult Scandinavians' use of powered scooters: user satisfaction, frequency of use, and prediction of daily use
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate user satisfaction with characteristics of powered scooters (scooters), frequency of use, and factors predicting daily scooter use.
Design: Cross-sectional.
Sample: Adult scooter users (n = 59) in Denmark and Norway, mean age 74.5 (standard deviation 12.3) years.
Methods: Structured face-to-face interviews. The NOMO 1.0, the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive devices (QUEST 2.0), and a study specific instrument were used to collect data. Descriptive statistics were applied, and regression analyzes were used to investigate predictors for daily scooter use. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) served as a framework for classifying variables and guiding the investigation.
Results: Satisfaction with the scooter characteristics was high with most participants being very satisfied or quite satisfied (66.1-91.5%). Most scooters were used daily (36.2%) or several times a week (50.0%). User satisfaction with safety of the scooter [odds ratio (OR) = 11.76, confidence interval (CI) = 1.70-81.28] and reduced balance (OR = 5.63, CI = 0.90-35.39) increased the likelihood of daily use, while reduced function in back and/or legs (OR = .04, CI = 0.00-0.75), tiredness (OR = .06, CI = 0.01-0.51), and increased age (OR = .93, CI = 0.87-1.00) reduced the likelihood of daily use. 52.8% of the variance was explained by these variables.
Conclusions: User satisfaction was high, and most scooters were used frequently. User satisfaction with safety, specific functional limitations and age were predictors for daily scooter use. Implications for Rehabilitation Scooters seem to be a beneficial intervention for people with mobility impairment: user satisfaction and frequency of use are high. Users' subjective feeling of safety should be secured in the service delivery process in order to support safe and frequent scooter use. Training of scooter skills should be considered in the service delivery process.
Keywords: Assistive technology; mobility devices; outcomes; rehabilitation; user evaluation.
Similar articles
-
Documentation of and satisfaction with the service delivery process of electric powered scooters among adult users in different national contexts.Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013 Mar;8(2):151-60. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2012.699584. Epub 2012 Jul 17. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013. PMID: 22804870
-
The experience of being a motorised mobility scooter user.Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2014 May;9(3):183-7. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2013.814171. Epub 2013 Jun 26. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2014. PMID: 23802129
-
Perception of needing and using a mobility scooter: a preclinically disabled non-scooter user perspective.Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019 Oct;14(7):732-736. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2018.1499136. Epub 2018 Jul 25. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019. PMID: 30044686
-
Scoping review of mobility scooter-related research studies.J Rehabil Res Dev. 2016;53(5):531-540. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2015.05.0084. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2016. PMID: 27898156
-
The meaning ascribed to wheeled mobility devices by individuals who use wheelchairs and scooters: a metasynthesis.Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018 Apr;13(3):253-262. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2017.1306594. Epub 2017 Apr 5. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018. PMID: 28379744 Review.
Cited by
-
Differences in perception of safety in driving environment according to shared PMD user experience through multi-criteria analysis.Heliyon. 2023 Feb 9;9(2):e13615. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13615. eCollection 2023 Feb. Heliyon. 2023. PMID: 36852026 Free PMC article.
-
Estimation of Steering and Throttle Angles of a Motorized Mobility Scooter with Inertial Measurement Units for Continuous Quantification of Driving Operation.Sensors (Basel). 2022 Apr 20;22(9):3161. doi: 10.3390/s22093161. Sensors (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35590851 Free PMC article.
-
A Systematic Review of Outcomes Measured Following New Wheelchair and Seating-Prescription Interventions in Adults.Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2022 Nov 28;5(1):100249. doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2022.100249. eCollection 2023 Mar. Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2022. PMID: 36968160 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical