A survey of credentialing for ERCP in the United States
- PMID: 28366439
- DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.03.1530
A survey of credentialing for ERCP in the United States
Abstract
Background and aims: There are limited data measuring the variability in standards used by hospitals for credentialing physicians to ERCP in the United States.
Methods: We performed an electronic survey of U.S. gastroenterologists.
Results: Among 1126 respondents, 21% reported that their hospitals had no written guidelines for initial credentialing, and 59% reported that their hospitals had no written guidelines for repeat credentialing. Among those with guidelines, less than half had any of the criteria recommended by the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.
Conclusions: There is an urgent need to improve the credentialing process to enhance practice and to protect patients. An easy-to-use national system for recording and reporting ERCP quality data, like that of the GI Quality Improvement Consortium, is needed.
Copyright © 2017 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Reporting progress in ERCP hospital credentialing and quality review: stagnant is an understatement.Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Nov;86(5):870-871. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.07.001. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017. PMID: 29061258 No abstract available.
-
Response.Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 May;87(5):1365-1366. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.01.003. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018. PMID: 29655437 No abstract available.
-
ERCP credentialing approaches in Australia and throughout the world.Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 May;87(5):1365. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.12.012. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018. PMID: 29655438 No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
