Interrelationship between insulin resistance and portal haemodynamic abnormality in cirrhosis

Abstract

Background: There are only limited data regarding the effect of impaired portal circulation on the glucose metabolism. The study prospectively examined the interrelationship between insulin resistance (IR) and portal haemodynamic abnormality in cirrhosis. Methods: There were 53 cirrhosis patients (61.6 ± 13.0 years) all presenting gastroesophageal varices. Portal haemodynamics by both hepatic venous catheterisation and Doppler ultrasound were examined with respect to the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA)-IR and HOMA2-IR. The IR was defined by HOMA-IR > 3.0 or HOMA2-IR > 2.0. Results: Forty-two patients (79.2%) had collateral vessels, 38 with left gastric vein, 12 with short/posterior gastric vein, 9 with splenorenal shunt, and 3 with inferior mesenteric vein. Multivariate analysis provided significant factors; wedged hepatic venous pressure (HR1.183, 95% CI 1.012-1.383, p=0.035) for HOMA-IR > 3.0, body mass index for HOMA2-IR > 2.0 (HR1.490, 95% CI 1.176-1.888, p=0.001), and collateral flow volume for both HOMA-IR > 3.0 (HR1.007, 95% CI 1.001-1.014, p=0.015) and HOMA2-IR > 2.0 (HR 1.007, 95% CI 1.002-1.013, p=0.009). The best cut-off value of collateral flow volume was 165 ml/min for detecting the HOMA-IR > 3.0 showing area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) 0.688 (Odds ratio, 5.33) with sensitivity 70% and specificity 69.6%, and was 165 ml/min for detecting median value of HOMA2-IR > 2.0 showing AUROC 0.698 (odds ratio, 5.7) with sensitivity 75% and specificity 65.5%. Conclusion: There is a close linkage between the IR and impaired portal haemodynamics presented by the collateral development, suggesting the underlying pathogenesis of portal hypertension in cirrhosis patients.

Keywords: Insulin resistance; cirrhosis; diabetes; portal hemodynamics.

Figure 1

The best cut-off value of collateral flow volume was 165 ml/min for a detection of HOMA-IR 3.0 showing AUROC 0.688 (Odds ratio, 5.33) with sensitivity 70% and specificity 69.6%. AUROC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; HOMA, homeostasis model assessment; IR, insulin resistance

Figure 2

The best cut-off value of collateral flow volume was 165 ml/min for a detection of HOMA2-IR 2.0 showing AUROC 0.698 (Odds ratio, 5.7) with sensitivity 75% and specificity 65.5%. AUROC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; HOMA, homeostasis model assessment; IR, insulin resistance