Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Mar 29:10:84.
doi: 10.1186/s13068-017-0769-1. eCollection 2017.

Robust, high-productivity phototrophic carbon capture at high pH and alkalinity using natural microbial communities

Affiliations

Robust, high-productivity phototrophic carbon capture at high pH and alkalinity using natural microbial communities

Christine E Sharp et al. Biotechnol Biofuels. .

Abstract

Background: Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) has come to be seen as one of the most viable technologies to provide the negative carbon dioxide emissions needed to constrain global temperatures. In practice, algal biotechnology is the only form of BECCS that could be realized at scale without compromising food production. Current axenic algae cultivation systems lack robustness, are expensive and generally have marginal energy returns.

Results: Here it is shown that microbial communities sampled from alkaline soda lakes, grown as biofilms at high pH (up to 10) and high alkalinity (up to 0.5 kmol m-3 NaHCO3 and NaCO3) display excellent (>1.0 kg m-3 day-1) and robust (>80 days) biomass productivity, at low projected overall costs. The most productive biofilms contained >100 different species and were dominated by a cyanobacterium closely related to Phormidium kuetzingianum (>60%).

Conclusion: Frequent harvesting and red light were the key factors that governed the assembly of a stable and productive microbial community.

Keywords: Algae biofuel; Biofilm; Microbial ecology; Mixed-community; Phormidium kuetzingianum.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Photobioreactor microbial community composition based on 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. The figure shows relative abundance and taxonomic assignments of the most abundant populations (>2% per lake average abundance) for duplicate photobioreactors inoculated with a Deer Lake, b Goodenough Lake, c Last Chance Lake and d Probe Lake mats at 0, 58, 85, 98 and 128 days. Eukaryotic algae sequences are based on BLAST identification of sequence reads identified as chloroplasts
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Productivity of mixed-community phototrophic biofilms grown at pH 10, 0.5 M carbonates under red (a, open circle), white (b, open square) and blue (c, inverted triangle) light shown as oxygen production, volumetric (d) and surface areal (e) productivities
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Photobioreactor microbial community composition based on 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing and fluorescence microscopy. The figure shows relative abundance and taxonomic assignments of the most abundant populations (>1% relative abundance) for photobioreactors illuminated with red (a), blue (b), and white (c) light, during 77 days. Fluorescence microscopy images of biomass from the red light (d) showing the dominance of a cyanobacterium closely related to Phormidium and blue light (e) showing the dominance of a diatom closely related to Nitzschia. Eukaryotic algae sequences are based on BLAST identification of sequence reads identified as chloroplasts
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Productivity of a mixed-community biofilm grown at pH 9.0, 0.5 M bicarbonate illuminated with red light as a function of oxygen production (a) volumetric (b) and surface areal (c) productivity. d Relative abundance and taxonomic affiliations of abundant populations (>1% relative abundance) based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing on day 20. Eukaryotic algae sequences are based on BLAST identification of sequence reads identified as chloroplasts

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Moss RH, Edmonds JA, Hibbard KA, Manning MR, Rose SK, van Vuuren DP, Carter TR, Emori S, Kainuma M, Kram T, et al. The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature. 2010;463(7282):747–756. doi: 10.1038/nature08823. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chase JM, Leibold MA. Ecological niches: linking classical and contemporary approaches. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2003.
    1. Gough C, Upham P. Biomass energy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS or Bio-CCS) Greenh Gases. 2011;1(4):324–334. doi: 10.1002/ghg.34. - DOI
    1. Newbold T, Hudson LN, Hill SLL, Contu S, Lysenko I, Senior RA, Borger L, Bennett DJ, Choimes A, Collen B, et al. Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity. Nature. 2015;520(7545):45–50. doi: 10.1038/nature14324. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Clarens AF, Resurreccion EP, White MA, Colosi LM. Environmental life cycle comparison of algae to other bioenergy feedstocks. Environ Sci Technol. 2010;44(5):1813–1819. doi: 10.1021/es902838n. - DOI - PubMed