Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Aug;23(4):779-796.
doi: 10.1111/jep.12718. Epub 2017 Mar 31.

Repeat prescribing of medications: A system-centred risk management model for primary care organisations

Affiliations

Repeat prescribing of medications: A system-centred risk management model for primary care organisations

Julie Price et al. J Eval Clin Pract. 2017 Aug.

Abstract

Rationale, aims and objectives: Reducing preventable harm from repeat medication prescriptions is a patient safety priority worldwide. In the United Kingdom, repeat prescriptions items issued has doubled in the last 20 years from 5.8 to 13.3 items per patient per annum. This has significant resource implications and consequences for avoidable patient harms. Consequently, we aimed to test a risk management model to identify, measure, and reduce repeat prescribing system risks in primary care.

Methods: All 48 general medical practices in National Health Service (NHS) Lambeth Clinical Commissioning Group (an inner city area of south London in England) were recruited. Multiple interventions were implemented, including educational workshops, a web-based risk monitoring system, and external reviews of repeat prescribing system risks by clinicians. Data were collected via documentation reviews and interviews and subject to basic thematic and descriptive statistical analyses.

Results: Across the 48 participating general practices, 62 unique repeat prescribing risks were identified on 505 occasions (eg, practices frequently experiencing difficulty interpreting medication changes on hospital discharge summaries), equating to a mean of 8.1 risks per practice (range: 1-33; SD = 7.13). Seven hundred sixty-seven system improvement actions were recommended across 96 categories (eg, alerting hospitals to illegible writing and delays with discharge summaries) with a mean of 15.6 actions per practice (range: 0-34; SD = 8.0).

Conclusions: The risk management model tested uncovered important safety concerns and facilitated the development and communication of related improvement recommendations. System-wide information on hazardous repeat prescribing and how this could be mitigated is very limited. The approach reported may have potential to close this gap and improve the reliability of general practice systems and patient safety, which should be of high interest to primary care organisations internationally.

Keywords: information technology; medication safety; patient safety; primary care; risk management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Avery AJ, Chaleb M, Barber N, et al. The prevalence and nature of prescribing and monitoring errors in English general practice: a retrospective case note review. Br J Gen Pract. 2013. doi: 10.3399/bjgp13X670679. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. The Health Foundation : Evidence scan: Levels of harm in Primary Care . London: 2011: Available at: http://www.health.org.uk/publications/levels‐of‐harm‐in‐primary‐care/Accessed May 10, 2015.
    1. Guthrie B, Makubate B, Hernandez‐Santiago V, et al. The rising tide of polypharmacy and drug‐drug interactions: Population database analysis 1995‐2010. BMC Med. 2015;13:74. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Petty DR, Zermansky AG, Alldred DP. The scale of repeat prescribing—time for an update. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:76. - PMC - PubMed
    1. De Smet PA, Dautzenberg M. Repeat prescribing: scale, problems and quality management in ambulatory care patients. Drugs. 2004;64:1779‐1800. - PubMed

MeSH terms