Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jan 1;57(1):59-63.
doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex050.

Evaluating the design and reporting of pragmatic trials in osteoarthritis research

Shabana Amanda Ali  1 , Marita Kloseck  1 , Karen Lee  1 , Kathleen Ellen Walsh  2 , Joy C MacDermid  1   3 , Deborah Fitzsimmons  1   4   5
Affiliations

Evaluating the design and reporting of pragmatic trials in osteoarthritis research

Shabana Amanda Ali et al. Rheumatology (Oxford). .

Abstract

Objectives: Among the challenges in health research is translating interventions from controlled experimental settings to clinical and community settings where chronic disease is managed daily. Pragmatic trials offer a method for testing interventions in real-world settings but are seldom used in OA research. The aim of this study was to evaluate the literature on pragmatic trials in OA research up to August 2016 in order to identify strengths and weaknesses in the design and reporting of these trials.

Methods: We used established guidelines to assess the degree to which 61 OA studies complied with pragmatic trial design and reporting. We assessed design according to the pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary and reporting according to the pragmatic trials extension of the CONsolidated Standards of Reporting Trials guidelines.

Results: None of the pragmatic trials met all 11 criteria evaluated and most of the trials met between 5 and 8 of the criteria. Criteria most often unmet pertained to practitioner expertise (by requiring specialists) and criteria most often met pertained to primary outcome analysis (by using intention-to-treat analysis).

Conclusion: Our results suggest a lack of highly pragmatic trials in OA research. We identify this as a point of opportunity to improve research translation, since optimizing the design and reporting of pragmatic trials can facilitate implementation of evidence-based interventions for OA care.

Keywords: CONSORT; PRECIS; implementation; osteoarthritis; pragmatic trials.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Hunter DJ, Schofield D, Callander E.. The individual and socioeconomic impact of osteoarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2014;10:437–41. - PubMed
    1. Hochberg MC, Altman RD, April KT. et al. American College of Rheumatology 2012 recommendations for the use of nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapies in osteoarthritis of the hand, hip, and knee. Arthritis Care Res 2012;64:465–74. - PubMed
    1. McAlindon TE, Bannuru RR, Sullivan MC. et al. OARSI guidelines for the non-surgical management of knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2014;22:363–88. - PubMed
    1. Paskins Z, Sanders T, Croft PR, Hassell AB.. The identity crisis of osteoarthritis in general practice: a qualitative study using video-stimulated recall. Ann Fam Med 2015;13:537–44. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nilsen P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implement Sci 2015;10:53. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms