Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Apr 3;7(1):569.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00556-3.

Occupational eye dose in interventional cardiology procedures

Affiliations

Occupational eye dose in interventional cardiology procedures

Yoshihiro Haga et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

It is important to measure the radiation dose [3-mm dose equivalent, Hp(3)] in the eye. This study was to determine the current occupational radiation eye dose of staff conducting interventional cardiology procedures, using a novel direct eye dosimeter. We measured the occupational eye dose [Hp(3)] in physicians and nurses in a catheterization laboratory for 6-months. The eye doses [Hp(3)] of 12 physicians (9 with Pb glasses, 3 without), and 11 nurses were recorded using a novel direct eye dosimeter, the DOSIRISTM. We placed dosimeters above and under the glasses. We also estimated the eye dose [0.07-mm dose equivalent] using a neck personal dosimeter. The eye doses among interventional staff ranked in the following order: physicians without Pb glasses > physicians with Pb glasses > nurses. The shielding effect of the glasses (0.07-mm Pb) in a clinical setting was approximately 60%. In physicians who do not wear Pb glasses, the eye dose may exceed the new regulatory limit for IR staff. We found good correlations between the neck dosimeter dose and eye dosimeter dose (inside or outside glasses, R2 = 0.93 and R2 = 0.86, respectively) in physicians. We recommend that interventional physicians use an eye dosimeter for correct evaluation of the lens dose.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The positions of the dosimeters used during the procedures. The eye dosimeter (DOSIRIS) was worn just lateral to the left eye, and the personal dosimeter (badge) was worn outside the Pb apron to the left of the neck (A). In the nine physicians using Pb glasses, an additional eye dosimeter (DOSIRIS) was worn outside the Pb glasses close to the left eye (B).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Relationship between the eye dose (DOSIRIS) measurements and neck badge dose measurements for 6 months in 12 IC physicians: nine physicians used Pb glasses and three did not. Dashed line (---): 95% confidence interval.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Estimated mean ± SD annual lens dose (EAED) in 12 IC physicians estimated by eye dose (DOSIRIS) measurements (9 physicians used Pb glasses and 3 did not) and neck badge dose measurements.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Relationship between the eye dose (DOSIRIS) measurements inside and outside the Pb glasses over 6 months in nine physicians. Dashed line (---): 95% confidence interval.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Relationship between the eye dose (DOSIRIS) and neck badge dose measurements over 6 months in 11 IC nurses. Dashed line (---): 95% confidence interval.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Estimated mean ± SD annual lens dose (EAED) determined by eye dose (DOSIRIS) measurements and neck badge dose measurements in 11 IC nurses. (P = 0.39).

References

    1. Balter S, Miller DL. Patient skin reactions from interventional fluoroscopy procedures. Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202:W335–W342. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.12029. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chida K, et al. Radiation dose of interventional radiology system using a flat-panel detector. Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193:1680–1685. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2747. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dauer LT, et al. Fears, feelings, and facts: interactively communicating benefits and risks of medical radiation with patients. Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:756–761. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.5956. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kato M, et al. The necessity of follow-up for radiation skin injuries in patients after percutaneous coronary interventions: radiation skin injuries will often be overlooked clinically. Acta Radiol. 2012;53:1040–1044. doi: 10.1258/ar.2012.120192. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chida K, et al. Relationship between fluoroscopic time, dose–area product, body weight, and maximum radiation skin dose in cardiac interventional procedures. Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186:774–778. doi: 10.2214/AJR.04.1653. - DOI - PubMed