Lifestyle interventions are feasible in patients with colorectal cancer with potential short-term health benefits: a systematic review
- PMID: 28374148
- PMCID: PMC5432596
- DOI: 10.1007/s00384-017-2797-5
Lifestyle interventions are feasible in patients with colorectal cancer with potential short-term health benefits: a systematic review
Abstract
Purpose: Lifestyle interventions have been proposed to improve cancer survivorship in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), but with treatment pathways becoming increasingly multi-modal and prolonged, opportunities for interventions may be limited. This systematic review assessed the evidence for the feasibility of performing lifestyle interventions in CRC patients and evaluated any short- and long-term health benefits.
Methods: Using PRISMA Guidelines, selected keywords identified randomised controlled studies (RCTs) of lifestyle interventions [smoking, alcohol, physical activity (PA) and diet/excess body weight] in CRC patients. These electronic databases were searched in June 2015: Dynamed, Cochrane Database, OVID MEDLINE, OVID EMBASE, and PEDro.
Results: Fourteen RCTs were identified: PA RCTs (n = 10) consisted mainly of telephone-prompted walking or cycling interventions of varied durations, predominately in adjuvant setting; dietary/excess weight interventions RCTs (n = 4) focused on low-fat and/or high-fibre diets within a multi-modal lifestyle intervention. There were no reported RCTs in smoking or alcohol cessation/reduction. PA and/or dietary/excess weight interventions reported variable recruitment rates, but good adherence and retention/follow-up rates, leading to short-term improvements in dietary quality, physical, psychological and quality-of-life parameters. Only one study assessed long-term follow-up, finding significantly improved cancer-specific survival after dietary intervention.
Conclusions: This is the first systematic review on lifestyle interventions in patients with CRC finding these interventions to be feasible with improvements in short-term health. Future work should focus on defining the optimal type of intervention (type, duration, timing and intensity) that not only leads to improved short-term outcomes but also assesses long-term survival.
Keywords: Colorectal cancer; Lifestyle interventions; Patient outcomes.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicting interests nor was any funding required for this work.
Figures
References
-
- Cancer Statistics (2016) Cancer Research UK. http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/st...
-
- World Cancer Research Fund International (2016) Continuous Update Project Report. Our Cancer Prevention Recommendations. http://www.wcrf.org/int/research-we-fund/our-cancer-prevention-recommend...
-
- Leitzmann M, Powers H, Anderson AS, Scoccianti C, Berrino F, Boultron-Ruault MC, Cecchini M, Espina C, Ket TJ, Norat T, Wiseman M, Romieu I. European Code against Cancer 4th Edition: physical activity and cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. 2015;39(suppl 1):S46–S55. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2015.03.009. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Anderson AS, Key TJ, Norat T, Scoccianti C, Cecchini M, Berrino F, Boutron-Ruault M-C, Espina C, Leitzmann M, Powers H, Wiseman M, Romieu European Code against Cancer 4th Edition: obesity, body fatness and cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. 2015;39(suppl 1):S34–S45. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2015.01.017. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
