Local infiltration for postsurgical analgesia following total hip arthroplasty: a comparison of liposomal bupivacaine to traditional bupivacaine
- PMID: 28375752
- DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1314262
Local infiltration for postsurgical analgesia following total hip arthroplasty: a comparison of liposomal bupivacaine to traditional bupivacaine
Abstract
Objective: To assess postsurgical clinical and economic outcomes of patients who received local infiltration containing liposomal bupivacaine versus traditional bupivacaine for pain management following total hip arthroplasty (THA).
Methods: This retrospective study included two groups of consecutive patients undergoing THA. The experimental group received local infiltration with a combination of liposomal bupivacaine, bupivacaine HCl 0.25% with epinephrine 1:200,000, and ketorolac for postsurgical analgesia. The historical control group received the previous standard of care: local infiltration with a combination of bupivacaine HCl 0.25% with epinephrine 1:200,000 and ketorolac. Key outcomes included distance walked, length of stay (LOS), opioid medication use, numeric pain scores, hospital charges, hospital costs, all-cause 30 day readmission rate, and adverse events (AEs). Both unadjusted and adjusted (i.e. age, sex, insurance type, living situation, body mass index, procedure side, and comorbidity) outcomes were compared between the two groups.
Results: The experimental group (n = 64) demonstrated statistically significant improvement versus the historical control group (n = 66) in mean distance walked on discharge day (249.2 vs. 180.0 feet; unadjusted p = .025, adjusted p = .070), mean LOS (2.0 vs. 2.7 days; p < .001, p = .002), proportion of patients who used opioid rescue medication on postoperative day (POD) 1 (29.7% vs. 56.1%; p = .002, p = .003) and POD 2 (7.8% vs. 30.3%; p = .001, p = .003), mean cumulative area under the curve for pain score on POD 0 (127.6 vs. 292.5; p < .001, both), POD 1 (92.9 vs. 185.0; p < .001, both), and POD 2 (93.8 vs. 213.8; p = .006, both). Among a subgroup of patients with available financial information, mean hospital charges were lower in the experimental group ($43,794 [n = 24] vs. $48,010 [n = 66]; p < .001, both). Rates of all-cause 30 day readmission and AEs were not significantly different between groups. No falls occurred.
Conclusions: Infiltration at the surgical site with liposomal bupivacaine was associated with improved postsurgical outcomes when compared with traditional bupivacaine in patients undergoing THA.
Keywords: Analgesia; arthroplasty; hip; hospital charges; length of stay; pain; patient readmission; postoperative; recovery of function; replacement.
Similar articles
-
Impact of liposomal bupivacaine on opioid use, hospital length of stay, discharge status, and hospitalization costs in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty.J Med Econ. 2019 Dec;22(12):1253-1260. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1627363. Epub 2019 Jun 21. J Med Econ. 2019. PMID: 31161837
-
Role of Periarticular Liposomal Bupivacaine Infiltration in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty-A Meta-analysis of Comparative Trials.J Arthroplasty. 2017 Feb;32(2):675-688.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.09.042. Epub 2016 Oct 8. J Arthroplasty. 2017. PMID: 28029532 Review.
-
Continuous Posterior Lumbar Plexus Nerve Block Versus Periarticular Injection with Ropivacaine or Liposomal Bupivacaine for Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Three-Arm Randomized Clinical Trial.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Nov 1;99(21):1836-1845. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01305. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017. PMID: 29088038 Clinical Trial.
-
A Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing Liposomal Bupivacaine vs Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block for Postoperative Pain Control in Total Hip Arthroplasty.J Arthroplasty. 2017 Jul;32(7):2181-2185. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.02.019. Epub 2017 Feb 16. J Arthroplasty. 2017. PMID: 28318860 Clinical Trial.
-
Evolving Role of Local Anesthetics in Managing Postsurgical Analgesia.Clin Ther. 2015 Jun 1;37(6):1354-71. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.03.017. Epub 2015 Apr 10. Clin Ther. 2015. PMID: 25866297 Review.
Cited by
-
The efficiency and safety of local liposomal bupivacaine infiltration for pain control in total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Dec;96(49):e8433. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008433. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017. PMID: 29245214 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of liposomal bupivacaine in preoperative fascia iliac block on postoperative pain and delirium in elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery: a study protocol for a randomised, parallel controlled prospective clinical study.BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 6;14(1):e079067. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079067. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 38184312 Free PMC article.
-
CORR Insights®: No Clinically Important Difference in Pain Scores After THA Between Periarticular Analgesic Injection and Placebo: A Randomized Trial.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Sep;476(9):1846-1847. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000401. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018. PMID: 30024466 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Liposomes for Intra-Articular Analgesic Drug Delivery in Orthopedics: State-of-Art and Future Perspectives. Insights from a Systematic Mini-Review of the Literature.Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 Aug 20;56(9):423. doi: 10.3390/medicina56090423. Medicina (Kaunas). 2020. PMID: 32825518 Free PMC article.
-
Risk factors for liposomal bupivacaine resistance after total hip or knee arthroplasties: a retrospective observational cohort in 237 patients.Patient Saf Surg. 2020 Jan 30;14:6. doi: 10.1186/s13037-020-0230-4. eCollection 2020. Patient Saf Surg. 2020. PMID: 32015758 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical