Pain, Agitation, and Delirium Guidelines: Interprofessional Perspectives to Translate the Evidence
- PMID: 28375992
- DOI: 10.1097/DCC.0000000000000239
Pain, Agitation, and Delirium Guidelines: Interprofessional Perspectives to Translate the Evidence
Abstract
Background: Societal guidelines exist for the management of pain, agitation, and delirium (PAD) in critically ill patients. This contemporary practice aims for a more awake and interactive patient. Institutions are challenged to translate the interrelated multivariable concepts of PAD into daily clinical practice and to demonstrate improvement in quality outcomes. An interdisciplinary goal-directed approach shows outcomes in high-acuity surgical critical care during the early stages of implementation.
Methods: This study was a prospective preintervention and postintervention design. A formal PAD clinical practice guideline targeting standardized assessment and "light" levels of sedation was instituted. All mechanically ventilated patients admitted to a 24-bed surgical intensive care unit (ICU) at an academic medical center during a 6-month period were included (3 months before and 3 months after implementation). Sedation and agitation were measured using the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS), pain measured using a Behavioral or Numeric Pain Scale (NPS/BPS), and delirium using the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit. Total ventilator days with exposure to continuous opioid or sedative infusions and total ICU days where the patient received a physical activity session exercising out of bed were recorded.
Results: There were 106 patients (54 at preintervention and 52 at postintervention). Mean percentage of RASS scores between 0 to -1 increased from 38% to 50% postintervention (P < .02). Mean percentage of NPS/BPS scores within the goal range (<5 for BPS and <3 for NPS) remained stable, 86% to 83% (P = .16). There was a decrease in use of continuous narcotic infusions for mechanically ventilated patients. This was reported as mean percentage of total ventilator days with a continuous opioid infusing: 65% before implementation versus 47% after implementation (P < .01). Mean percentage of ICU days with physical activity sessions increased from 24% to 41% (P < .001). Overall mean ventilator-free days and ICU length of stay were 5.4 to 4.5 days (P = .29) and 11.75 to 9.5 days (P = .20), respectively.
Conclusion: Measureable patient outcomes are achievable in the early stages of PAD guideline initiatives and can inform future systems-level organizational change. Pain, agitation, and delirium assessment tools form the foundation for clinical implementation and evaluation. High-acuity surgical critical care patients can achieve more time at goal RASS, decreased ventilator days, and less exposure to continuous opioid infusions, all while maintaining stable analgesia.
Similar articles
-
An analgesia-delirium-sedation protocol for critically ill trauma patients reduces ventilator days and hospital length of stay.J Trauma. 2008 Sep;65(3):517-26. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318181b8f6. J Trauma. 2008. PMID: 18784563
-
The methodological approach used to develop the 2013 Pain, Agitation, and Delirium Clinical Practice Guidelines for adult ICU patients.Crit Care Med. 2013 Sep;41(9 Suppl 1):S1-15. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182a167d7. Crit Care Med. 2013. PMID: 23989088 Review.
-
Five-Year Outcomes After Implementing a Pain, Agitation, and Delirium Protocol in a Mixed Intensive Care Unit.J Intensive Care Med. 2022 Aug;37(8):1060-1066. doi: 10.1177/08850666211063404. Epub 2021 Nov 29. J Intensive Care Med. 2022. PMID: 34841939
-
Impact of systematic evaluation of pain and agitation in an intensive care unit.Crit Care Med. 2006 Jun;34(6):1691-9. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000218416.62457.56. Crit Care Med. 2006. PMID: 16625136 Clinical Trial.
-
Application of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Pain, Agitation, and Delirium.Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2016 Jun;28(2):241-52. doi: 10.1016/j.cnc.2016.02.001. Epub 2016 Mar 30. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2016. PMID: 27215361 Review.
Cited by
-
Pain Behavior Experienced During Nursing Interventions by Patients on Mechanical Ventilation: A Cross-Sectional Study.Florence Nightingale J Nurs. 2022 Jun;30(2):126-132. doi: 10.54614/FNJN.2022.21178. Florence Nightingale J Nurs. 2022. PMID: 35699629 Free PMC article.
-
[Delirium in intensive care patients : A multiprofessional challenge].Anaesthesist. 2018 Nov;67(11):811-820. doi: 10.1007/s00101-018-0497-3. Anaesthesist. 2018. PMID: 30298270 Review. German.
-
Clinical Impact of the Implementation Strategies Used to Apply the 2013 Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium or 2018 Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility, Sleep Disruption Guideline Recommendations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Crit Care Med. 2024 Apr 1;52(4):626-636. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006178. Epub 2024 Jan 9. Crit Care Med. 2024. PMID: 38193764 Free PMC article.
-
Occurrence and Practices for Pain, Agitation, and Delirium in Intensive Care Unit Patients.P R Health Sci J. 2019 Sep;38(3):156-162. P R Health Sci J. 2019. PMID: 31536628 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical