Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 May 2;51(9):4740-4754.
doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b05640. Epub 2017 Apr 18.

Organic Pollutants in Shale Gas Flowback and Produced Waters: Identification, Potential Ecological Impact, and Implications for Treatment Strategies

Affiliations
Review

Organic Pollutants in Shale Gas Flowback and Produced Waters: Identification, Potential Ecological Impact, and Implications for Treatment Strategies

Andrii Butkovskyi et al. Environ Sci Technol. .

Abstract

Organic contaminants in shale gas flowback and produced water (FPW) are traditionally expressed as total organic carbon (TOC) or chemical oxygen demand (COD), though these parameters do not provide information on the toxicity and environmental fate of individual components. This review addresses identification of individual organic contaminants in FPW, and stresses the gaps in the knowledge on FPW composition that exist so far. Furthermore, the risk quotient approach was applied to predict the toxicity of the quantified organic compounds for fresh water organisms in recipient surface waters. This resulted in an identification of a number of FPW related organic compounds that are potentially harmful namely those compounds originating from shale formations (e.g., polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, phthalates), fracturing fluids (e.g., quaternary ammonium biocides, 2-butoxyethanol) and downhole transformations of organic compounds (e.g., carbon disulfide, halogenated organic compounds). Removal of these compounds by FPW treatment processes is reviewed and potential and efficient abatement strategies are defined.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
River Dommel as a model stream for calculation of environmental impact of the FPW chemicals on aquatic environment.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Melikoglu M. Shale gas: Analysis of its role in the global energy market. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2014, 37, 460–468. 10.1016/j.rser.2014.05.002. - DOI
    1. Howarth R. W.; Ingraffea A.; Engelder T. Natural gas: Should fracking stop?. Nature 2011, 477 (7364), 271–273. 10.1038/477271a. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sovacool B. K. Cornucopia or curse? Reviewing the costs and benefits of shale gas hydraulic fracturing (fracking). Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2014, 37, 249–264. 10.1016/j.rser.2014.04.068. - DOI
    1. Wang Q.; Chen X.; Jha A. N.; Rogers H. Natural gas from shale formation - The evolution, evidences and challenges of shale gas revolution in United States. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2014, 30, 1–28. 10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.065. - DOI
    1. Ziemkiewicz P. F.; Quaranta J. D.; Darnell A.; Wise R. Exposure pathways related to shale gas development and procedures for reducing environmental and public risk. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2014, 16, 77–84. 10.1016/j.jngse.2013.11.003. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources