Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Apr;105(2):160-166.
doi: 10.5195/jmla.2017.221.

Improving data collection, documentation, and workflow in a dementia screening study

Kevin B Read, Fred Willie Zametkin LaPolla, Magdalena I Tolea, James E Galvin, Alisa Surkis

Improving data collection, documentation, and workflow in a dementia screening study

Kevin B Read et al. J Med Libr Assoc. 2017 Apr.

Abstract

Background: A clinical study team performing three multicultural dementia screening studies identified the need to improve data management practices and facilitate data sharing. A collaboration was initiated with librarians as part of the National Library of Medicine (NLM) informationist supplement program. The librarians identified areas for improvement in the studies' data collection, entry, and processing workflows.

Case presentation: The librarians' role in this project was to meet needs expressed by the study team around improving data collection and processing workflows to increase study efficiency and ensure data quality. The librarians addressed the data collection, entry, and processing weaknesses through standardizing and renaming variables, creating an electronic data capture system using REDCap, and developing well-documented, reproducible data processing workflows.

Conclusions: NLM informationist supplements provide librarians with valuable experience in collaborating with study teams to address their data needs. For this project, the librarians gained skills in project management, REDCap, and understanding of the challenges and specifics of a clinical research study. However, the time and effort required to provide targeted and intensive support for one study team was not scalable to the library's broader user community.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Original study workflow
Figure 2
Figure 2
Revised study workflow after completion of informationist project
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Davis HM, Cross WM. Using a data management plan review service as a training ground for librarians. J Libr Sch Commun. 2015;3(2):eP1243.
    1. Creamer AT, Morales ME, Kafel D, Crespo J, Martin ER. A sample of research data curation and management courses. J eSci Libr. 2012;1(2):4.
    1. Piorun ME, Kafel D, Leger-Hornby T, Najafi S, Martin ER, Colombo P, LaPelle NR. Teaching research data management: an undergraduate/graduate curriculum. J eSci Libr. 2012;1(3)
    1. Palumbo LB, Jantz R, Lin YH, Morgan A, Wang M, White K, Womack R, Zhang Y, Zhu Y. Preparing to accept research data: creating guidelines for librarians. J eSci Libr. 2015;4(2):1.
    1. Federer L, editor. The Medical Library Association guide to data management for librarians. Rowman & Littlefield; 2016. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources