Diffusion of digital breast tomosynthesis among women in primary care: associations with insurance type
- PMID: 28378409
- PMCID: PMC5430135
- DOI: 10.1002/cam4.1036
Diffusion of digital breast tomosynthesis among women in primary care: associations with insurance type
Abstract
Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) has shown potential to improve breast cancer screening and diagnosis compared to digital mammography (DM). The FDA approved DBT use in conjunction with conventional DM in 2011, but coverage was approved by CMS recently in 2015. Given changes in coverage policies, it is important to monitor diffusion of DBT by insurance type. This study examined DBT trends and estimated associations with insurance type. From June 2011 to September 2014, DBT use in 22 primary care centers in the Dartmouth -Brigham and Women's Hospital Population-based Research Optimizing Screening through Personalized Regimens research center (PROSPR) was examined among women aged 40-89. A longitudinal repeated measures analysis estimated the proportion of DBT performed for screening or diagnostic indications over time and by insurance type. During the study period, 93,182 mammograms were performed on 48,234 women. Of these exams, 16,506 DBT tests were performed for screening (18.1%) and 2537 were performed for diagnosis (15.7%). Between 2011 and 2014, DBT utilization increased in all insurance groups. However, by the latest observed period, screening DBT was used more frequently under private insurance (43.4%) than Medicaid (36.2%), Medicare (37.8%), other (38.6%), or no insurance (32.9%; P < 0.0001). No sustained differences in use of DBT for diagnostic testing were seen by insurance type. DBT is increasingly used for breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Use of screening DBT may be associated with insurance type. Surveillance is required to ensure that disparities in breast cancer screening are minimized as DBT becomes more widely available.
Keywords: Access to care; cancer screening; digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT); digital mammography (DM); health disparities.
© 2017 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Figures
References
-
- Rafferty, E. A. , Park J. M., Philpotts L. E., Poplack S. P., Sumkin J. H., Halpern E. F., et al. 2013. Assessing radiologist performance using combined digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis compared with digital mammography alone: results of a multicenter, multireader trial. Radiology 266:104–113. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Conant, E. F. , Beaber E. F., Sprague B. L., Herschorn S. D., Weaver D. L., Onega T., et al. 2016. Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography compared to digital mammography alone: a cohort study within the PROSPR consortium. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 156:109–116. - PMC - PubMed
-
- McDonald, E. S. , Oustimov A., Weinstein S. P., Synnestvedt M. B., Schnall M., and Conant E. F.. 2016. Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Compared With Digital Mammography: outcomes Analysis From 3 Years of Breast Cancer Screening. JAMA Oncol (in Press). - PubMed
-
- Friedewald, S. M. , Rafferty E. A., and Conant E. F.. 2014. Breast cancer screening with tomosynthesis and digital mammography‐reply. JAMA 312:1695–1696. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
