Two-Year Outcome after Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
- PMID: 28379802
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1612136
Two-Year Outcome after Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Abstract
Background: Several trials involving patients with acute ischemic stroke have shown better functional outcomes with endovascular treatment than with conventional treatment at 90 days after initiation of treatment. However, results on long-term clinical outcomes are lacking.
Methods: We assessed clinical outcomes 2 years after patients were randomly assigned to receive either endovascular treatment (intervention group) or conventional treatment (control group) for acute ischemic stroke. The primary outcome was the score on the modified Rankin scale at 2 years; this scale measures functional outcome, with scores ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (death). Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality and the quality of life at 2 years, as measured by means of a health utility index that is based on the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions questionnaire (scores range from -0.329 to 1, with higher scores indicating better health).
Results: Of the 500 patients who underwent randomization in the original trial, 2-year data for this extended follow-up trial were available for 391 patients (78.2%) and information on death was available for 459 patients (91.8%). The distribution of outcomes on the modified Rankin scale favored endovascular treatment over conventional treatment (adjusted common odds ratio, 1.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15 to 2.45; P=0.007). There was no significant difference between the treatment groups in the percentage of patients who had an excellent outcome (i.e., a modified Rankin scale score of 0 or 1). The mean quality-of-life score was 0.48 among patients randomly assigned to endovascular treatment as compared with 0.38 among patients randomly assigned to conventional treatment (mean difference, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.16; P=0.006). The cumulative 2-year mortality rate was 26.0% in the intervention group and 31.0% in the control group (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.6 to 1.2; P=0.46).
Conclusions: In this extended follow-up trial, the beneficial effect of endovascular treatment on functional outcome at 2 years in patients with acute ischemic stroke was similar to that reported at 90 days in the original trial. (Funded by the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development and others; MR CLEAN Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN10888758 , and Netherlands Trial Register number, NTR1804 , and MR CLEAN extended follow-up trial Netherlands Trial Register number, NTR5073 .).
Comment in
-
Two-Year Outcome after Endovascular Treatment for Stroke.N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 29;376(26):2597. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1705673. N Engl J Med. 2017. PMID: 28691785 No abstract available.
-
In acute ischemic stroke, adding early endovascular treatment to usual care improved functional outcomes at 2 y.Ann Intern Med. 2017 Sep 19;167(6):JC29. doi: 10.7326/ACPJC-2017-167-6-029. Ann Intern Med. 2017. PMID: 28975319 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Two-year clinical follow-up of the Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in The Netherlands (MR CLEAN): design and statistical analysis plan of the extended follow-up study.Trials. 2016 Nov 22;17(1):555. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1669-6. Trials. 2016. PMID: 27876083 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke in routine clinical practice: prospective, observational cohort study (MR CLEAN Registry).BMJ. 2018 Mar 9;360:k949. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k949. BMJ. 2018. PMID: 29523557 Free PMC article.
-
Safety and efficacy of thrombectomy in acute ischaemic stroke (REVASCAT): 1-year follow-up of a randomised open-label trial.Lancet Neurol. 2017 May;16(5):369-376. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30047-9. Epub 2017 Mar 16. Lancet Neurol. 2017. PMID: 28318984 Clinical Trial.
-
Is bridging with intravenous thrombolysis of any benefit in endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke?World Neurosurg. 2014 Sep-Oct;82(3-4):e453-8. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2013.01.097. Epub 2013 Feb 1. World Neurosurg. 2014. PMID: 23376392 Review.
-
Safety and Efficacy of Stent Retrievers for the Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke: Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Nov;8(13):1758-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.07.021. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015. PMID: 26476611 Review.
Cited by
-
Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Radiologic Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Emergency Setting.AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020 Apr;41(4):632-636. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6472. Epub 2020 Mar 12. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020. PMID: 32165364 Free PMC article.
-
What You Always Wanted to Know about Endovascular Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke but Never Dared to Ask: A Comprehensive Review.Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 11;23(10):340. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2310340. eCollection 2022 Oct. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022. PMID: 39077121 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Extended lipid profile in Romanian ischemic stroke patients in relation to stroke severity and outcome: a path analysis model.Arch Med Sci. 2019 Oct 23;17(4):864-873. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2019.89302. eCollection 2021. Arch Med Sci. 2019. PMID: 34336014 Free PMC article.
-
Mitochondrial Quality Control in Cerebral Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury.Mol Neurobiol. 2021 Oct;58(10):5253-5271. doi: 10.1007/s12035-021-02494-8. Epub 2021 Jul 18. Mol Neurobiol. 2021. PMID: 34275087 Review.
-
Budget impact of endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke patients in the Netherlands for 2015-2021.Neth Heart J. 2023 Jun;31(6):254-259. doi: 10.1007/s12471-023-01788-x. Epub 2023 May 12. Neth Heart J. 2023. PMID: 37171711 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical