Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Apr 1;10(4):359-371.
doi: 10.1242/dmm.028274.

In vivo models in breast cancer research: progress, challenges and future directions

Affiliations
Review

In vivo models in breast cancer research: progress, challenges and future directions

Ingunn Holen et al. Dis Model Mech. .

Abstract

Research using animal model systems has been instrumental in delivering improved therapies for breast cancer, as well as in generating new insights into the mechanisms that underpin development of the disease. A large number of different models are now available, reflecting different types and stages of the disease; choosing which one to use depends on the specific research question(s) to be investigated. Based on presentations and discussions from leading experts who attended a recent workshop focused on in vivo models of breast cancer, this article provides a perspective on the many varied uses of these models in breast cancer research, their strengths, associated challenges and future directions. Among the questions discussed were: how well do models represent the different stages of human disease; how can we model the involvement of the human immune system and microenvironment in breast cancer; what are the appropriate models of metastatic disease; can we use models to carry out preclinical drug trials and identify pathways responsible for drug resistance; and what are the limitations of patient-derived xenograft models? We briefly outline the areas where the existing breast cancer models require improvement in light of the increased understanding of the disease process, reflecting the drive towards more personalised therapies and identification of mechanisms of drug resistance.

Keywords: Breast cancer; CDX; EurOPDX; GEMM; Mouse models; PDX; SEARCHBreast.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing or financial interests.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Modelling breast cancer through the ages. The figure depicts a timeline of key events or developments in the evolution of mouse models of breast cancer over the years. Lowercase letters denote the following references, to which the reader is referred for further reading on specific milestones: aCardiff and Kenney, 2011; bBittner, 1936; cDeOme et al., 1959; dRygaard and Povsen, 2007; eFidler, 1973; fStewart et al., 1984; gMuller et al., 1988; hFu et al., 1993; iBaselga et al., 1998; jXu et al., 1999; kBeckhove et al., 2003; lBehbod et al., 2009; mDeRose et al., 2011; nWhittle et al., 2015; oWurth et al., 2015; phttps://www.jax.org/news-and-insights/jax-blog/2015/april/the-next-big-thing-in-cancer-modeling-patient-derived-xenografts-in-humaniz.

References

    1. Annunziato S., Kas S. M., Nethe M., Yücel H., Del Bravo J., Pritchard C., Bin Ali R., van Gerwen B., Siteur B., Drenth A. P. et al. (2016). Modeling invasive lobular breast carcinoma by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated somatic genome editing of the mammary gland. Genes Dev. 30, 1470-1480. 10.1101/gad.279190.116 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arun G., Diermeier S., Akerman M., Chang K.-C., Wilkinson J. E., Hearn S., Kim Y., MacLeod A. R., Krainer A. R., Norton L. et al. (2016). Differentiation of mammary tumors and reduction in metastasis upon Malat1 lncRNA loss. Genes Dev. 30, 34-51. 10.1101/gad.270959.115 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Banerji S., Cibulskis K., Rangel-Escareno C., Brown K. K., Carter S. L., Frederick A. M., Lawrence M. S., Sivachenko A. Y., Sougnez C., Zou L. et al. (2012). Sequence analysis of mutations and translocations across breast cancer subtypes. Nature 486, 405-409. 10.1038/nature11154 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bao L., Cardiff R. D., Steinbach P., Messer K. S. and Ellies L. G. (2015). Multipotent luminal mammary cancer stem cells model tumor heterogeneity. Breast Cancer Res. 17, 137 10.1186/s13058-015-0615-y - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baselga J., Norton L., Albanell J., Kim Y. M. and Mendelsohn J. (1998). Recombinant humanized anti-HER2 antibody (Herceptin) enhances the antitumor activity of paclitaxel and doxorubicin against HER2/neu overexpressing human breast cancer xenografts. Cancer Res. 58, 2825-2831. - PubMed

Publication types