Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Mar 22:8:415.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00415. eCollection 2017.

Demonstration and Pantomime in the Evolution of Teaching

Affiliations

Demonstration and Pantomime in the Evolution of Teaching

Peter Gärdenfors. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Donald proposes that early Homo evolved mimesis as a new form of cognition. This article investigates the mimesis hypothesis in relation to the evolution of teaching. The fundamental capacities that distinguish hominin teaching from that of other animals are demonstration and pantomime. A conceptual analysis of the instructional and communicative functions of demonstration and pantomime is presented. Archaeological evidence that demonstration was used for transmitting the Oldowan technology is summarized. It is argued that pantomime develops out of demonstration so that the primary objective of pantomime is that the onlooker learns the motoric patterns shown in the pantomime. The communicative use of pantomime is judged to be secondary. This use of pantomime is also contrasted with other forms of gestures. A key feature of the analysis is that the meaning of a pantomime is characterized by the force patterns of the movements. These force patterns form the core of a model of the cognitive mechanism behind pantomime. Finally, the role of pantomime in the evolution of language is also discussed.

Keywords: demonstration; evolution of language; gesture; mental simulation; mimesis; pantomime; teaching.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
The position of pantomime in the evolution of hominin cognition.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Arbib M. (2012). How the Brain Got Language: The Mirror System Hypothesis. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199896684.001.0001 - DOI
    1. Armstrong D. E., Stokoe W. C., Wilcox S. (1995). Gesture and the Nature of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 10.1017/CBO9780511620911 - DOI
    1. Bar-On D. (2013). Origins of meaning: Must we ‘go Gricean’? Mind Lang. 28 342–375. 10.1111/mila.12021 - DOI
    1. Bates L. A., Handford R., Lee P. C., Njiraini N., Poole J. H. (2010). Why do african elephants (Loxodonta africana) simulate oestrus? An analysis of longitudinal data. PLoS ONE 5:e10052 10.1371/journal.pone.0010052 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bering J. M., Bjorklund D. F., Ragan P. (2000). Deferred imitation of object-related actions in human-reared juvenile chimpanzees and orangutans. Dev. Psychobiol. 36 218–232. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2302(200004)36:3<218::AID-DEV5>3.0.CO;2-K - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources