Class I versus Class III radical hysterectomy in stage IB1 (tumor ≤ 2 cm) cervical cancer: a matched cohort study
- PMID: 28382145
- PMCID: PMC5381171
- DOI: 10.7150/jca.17663
Class I versus Class III radical hysterectomy in stage IB1 (tumor ≤ 2 cm) cervical cancer: a matched cohort study
Abstract
Background & Aims: The long-term oncological outcome of Class I hysterectomy to treat stage IB1 cervical cancer is unclear. The aim of the present study was to compare the surgical and long-term oncological outcomes of Class I hysterectomy and Class III radical hysterectomy for treatment of stage IB1 cervical cancer (tumor ≤ 2 cm). Methods: Seventy stage IB1 cervical cancer patients (tumor ≤ 2 cm) underwent Class I hysterectomy and 577 stage IB1 cervical cancer patients (tumor ≤ 2 cm) underwent Class III radical hysterectomy were matched with known risk factors for recurrence by greedy algorithm. Clinical, pathologic and follow-up data were retrospectively collected. Five-year survival outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier model. Results: After matching, a total of 70 patient pairs (Class I - Class III) were included. The median follow-up times were 75 (range, 26-170) months in the Class III group and 75 (range, 27-168) months in the Class I group. The Class I and Class III group had similar 5-year recurrence-free survival rates (RFS) (98.6% vs. 97.1%, P = 0.56) and overall survival rates (OS) (100.0% vs. 98.5%, P = 0.32). Compared with the Class III group, the Class I group resulted in significantly shorter operating time, less intra-operative blood loss, less intraoperative complications, less postoperative complications, and shorter hospital stay. Conclusions: These findings suggest that Class I hysterectomy is an oncological safe alternative to Class III radical hysterectomy in treatment of stage IB1 cervical cancer (tumor ≤ 2 cm) and Class I hysterectomy is associated with fewer perioperative complication and earlier recovery.
Keywords: Cervical cancer; Class I hysterectomy; Class III radical hysterectomy.; Oncological outcomes; Surgical outcomes.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.
Figures
Similar articles
-
[Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Dec;50(12):894-901. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2015. PMID: 26887872 Chinese.
-
Laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer patients with tumor size ≤ 2 cm: a case-matched control study.Int J Clin Oncol. 2020 May;25(5):937-947. doi: 10.1007/s10147-020-01630-z. Epub 2020 Feb 15. Int J Clin Oncol. 2020. PMID: 32062731 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of Robotic and laparoscopic Radical type-B and C hysterectomy for cervical cancer: Long term-outcomes.Acta Biomed. 2017 Oct 23;88(3):289-296. doi: 10.23750/abm.v88i3.6100. Acta Biomed. 2017. PMID: 29083333 Free PMC article.
-
Class I hysterectomy in stage Ia2-Ib1 cervical cancer.Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2018 Dec;13(4):494-500. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2018.76832. Epub 2018 Jun 29. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2018. PMID: 30524620 Free PMC article.
-
Oncologic outcome of fertility-sparing radical trachelectomy versus radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical carcinoma.Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Nov;111(2):255-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.07.014. Epub 2008 Aug 27. Gynecol Oncol. 2008. PMID: 18755500
Cited by
-
Nomogram Predicting Parametrial Involvement Based on the Radical Hysterectomy Specimens in the Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.Front Surg. 2021 Oct 27;8:759026. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.759026. eCollection 2021. Front Surg. 2021. PMID: 34778365 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy and safety analysis of non-radical surgery for early-stage cervical cancer (IA2 ~ IB1): a systematic review and meta-analysis.Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Apr 30;11:1337752. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1337752. eCollection 2024. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024. PMID: 38745744 Free PMC article.
-
The comparison of surgical outcomes and learning curves of radical hysterectomy by laparoscopy and robotic system for cervical cancer: an experience of a single surgeon.Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2018 Jul;61(4):468-476. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2018.61.4.468. Epub 2018 Jun 20. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2018. PMID: 30018901 Free PMC article.
-
A Multicenter Study on the Relationship of Tumor Lesion Location with Bilateral Parametrial Involvement and Pelvic Lymph Node Metastasis in Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 May;32(5):3449-3457. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16802-8. Epub 2025 Jan 25. Ann Surg Oncol. 2025. PMID: 39863803 Free PMC article.
-
Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Management of Women with Low-Risk Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Apr 12;15(8):985. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15080985. Diagnostics (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40310340 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL. et al. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65:87–108. - PubMed
-
- Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD. et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66:115–32. - PubMed
-
- Koh WJ, Greer BE, Abu-Rustum NR. et al. Cervical Cancer, Version 2.2015. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. 2015;13:395–404. quiz. - PubMed
-
- Dargent D, Martin X, Sacchetoni A. et al. Laparoscopic vaginal radical trachelectomy: a treatment to preserve the fertility of cervical carcinoma patients. Cancer. 2000;88:1877–82. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources