Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Mar 30:5:e3098.
doi: 10.7717/peerj.3098. eCollection 2017.

Metagenomic analysis exploring taxonomic and functional diversity of soil microbial communities in Chilean vineyards and surrounding native forests

Affiliations

Metagenomic analysis exploring taxonomic and functional diversity of soil microbial communities in Chilean vineyards and surrounding native forests

Luis E Castañeda et al. PeerJ. .

Abstract

Mediterranean biomes are biodiversity hotspots, and vineyards are important components of the Mediterranean landscape. Over the last few decades, the amount of land occupied by vineyards has augmented rapidly, thereby increasing threats to Mediterranean ecosystems. Land use change and agricultural management have important effects on soil biodiversity, because they change the physical and chemical properties of soil. These changes may also have consequences on wine production considering that soil is a key component of terroir. Here, we describe the taxonomic diversity and metabolic functions of bacterial and fungal communities present in forest and vineyard soils in Chile. To accomplish this goal, we collected soil samples from organic vineyards in central Chile and employed a shotgun metagenomic approach to sequence the microbial DNA. Additionally, we studied the surrounding native forest to obtain a baseline of the soil conditions in the area prior to the establishment of the vineyard. Our metagenomic analyses revealed that both habitats shared most of the soil microbial species. The most abundant genera in the two habitats were the bacteria Candidatus Solibacter and Bradyrhizobium and the fungus Gibberella. Our results suggest that the soil microbial communities are similar in these forests and vineyards. Therefore, we hypothesize that native forests surrounding the vineyards may be acting as a microbial reservoir buffering the effects of the land conversion. Regarding the metabolic diversity, we found that genes pertaining to the metabolism of amino acids, fatty acids, and nucleotides as well as genes involved in secondary metabolism were enriched in forest soils. On the other hand, genes related to miscellaneous functions were more abundant in vineyard soils. These results suggest that the metabolic function of microbes found in these habitats differs, though differences are not related to taxonomy. Finally, we propose that the implementation of environmentally friendly practices by the wine industry may help to maintain the microbial diversity and ecosystem functions associated with natural habitats.

Keywords: Bacterial diversity; Conservation; Ecosystem services; Fungal diversity; Pyrosequencing; Shotgun sequencing; Wine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Numbers and percentage of bacterial species found in forest and vineyard soils.
The number in the overlapping zone indicates how many species were shared between forest and vineyard soils, and the numbers in the non-overlapping zone indicate how many species were exclusively found in each habitat.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Ordination plot for microbial composition in soils.
Ordination plot from the canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) based on the abundance of OTUs found the microbial communities found in forest and vineyard soils.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Ordination plot for metabolic categories in soils.
Ordination plot from the canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) based on the relative abundances (points) and component loadings (text) of individual functional categories (SEED subsystem level 1) of the microbial communities found in forest and vineyard soils.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Functional categories found in soil microbial communities.
Bar plot showing the mean proportion (%) of functional categories found in soil microbial communities based on the subsystem database. Points indicate the differences between forest and vineyard soils (blue and orange bars, respectively), and the values at the right show the P-values were derived from a White’s non-parametric t-test (White, Nagarajan & Pop, 2009).

References

    1. Aballay E, Maternsson A, Persson P. Screening of rhizosphere bacteria from grapevine for their suppressive effect on Xiphinema index Thorne & Allen on in vitro grape plants. Plant and Soil. 2011;347(1–2):313–325. doi: 10.1007/s11104-011-0851-6. - DOI
    1. Anonymous . Definition of Viticultural ‘Terroir.’ Resolution OIV/VITI 333/2010. Tbilisi: International Organization of Vine and Wine General Assembly (OIV); 2010. [6 June 2016].
    1. Bai G, Shaner G. Management and resistance in wheat and barley to Fusarium head blight. Annual Review of Phytopathology. 2004;42(1):135–161. doi: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.42.040803.140340. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bester R. Stellenbosch: University of Stellenbosch; 2005. [6 June 2016]. Growth and survival of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in soil. MSc thesis.
    1. Bevivino A, Paganini P, Bacci G, Florio A, Pellicer MS, Papaleo MC, Mengoni A, Ledda L, Fani R, Benedetti A, Dalmastri C. Soil bacterial community response to differences in agricultural management along with seasonal changes in a Mediterranean region. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(8):e105515. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105515. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources