Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Apr;5(4):E253-E260.
doi: 10.1055/s-0043-101694.

The impact of diet liberalization on bowel preparation for colonoscopy

Affiliations

The impact of diet liberalization on bowel preparation for colonoscopy

James Walter et al. Endosc Int Open. 2017 Apr.

Abstract

Background and study aims Dietary restrictions are integral to colonoscopy preparation and impact patient satisfaction. Utilizing split-dose, lower-volume polyethylene glycol 3350-electrolyte solution (PEG-ELS), this study compared colon preparation adequacy of a low-residue diet to clear liquids using a validated grading scale. Patients and methods This was a prospective, randomized, single-blinded, single-center non-inferiority study evaluating diet the day prior to outpatient colonoscopy. Subjects were randomized to a Low-Residue diet for breakfast and lunch, or Clears only. All subjects received split dose PEG-ELS. The primary endpoint was preparation adequacy using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS), with adequate defined as a score > 5. Secondary endpoints included mean BBPS scores for the entire colon and individual segments, satisfaction, adverse events, polyp and adenoma detection rates, and impact on sleep and daily activities. Results Final analysis included 140 subjects, 72 assigned to Clears and 68 to Low-Residue. The Low-Residue diet was non-inferior to Clears (risk difference = - 5.08 %, P = 0.04) after adjusting for age. Mean colon cleansing scores were not significantly different overall and for individual colonic segments. Satisfaction with the Low-Residue diet was significantly greater (P = 0.01). The adenoma detection rate was not statistically significantly different between study groups, but the number of adenomas detected was significantly greater with Clears (P = 0.01). Adverse events and impact on sleep and activities did not differ significantly between diet arms. Conclusions A low-residue diet for breakfast and lunch the day prior to colonoscopy was non-inferior to clear liquids alone for achieving adequate colon cleansing when using split dose PEG-ELS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests None

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Patient assignment and disposition flow diagram.

References

    1. Harewood G C, Wiersema M J, Melton L J, 3rd et al. A prospective, controlled assessment of factors influencing acceptance of screening colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:3186–3194. - PubMed
    1. Soweid A M, Kobeissy A A, Jamali F R et al. A randomized single-blind trial of standard diet versus fiber-free diet with polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution for colonoscopy preparation. Endoscopy. 2010;42:633–638. - PubMed
    1. Gurudu S R, Ramirez F C, Harrison M Eet al. Increased adenoma detection rate with system-wide implementation of a split-dose preparation for colonoscopy Gastrointest Endosc 201276603–608.e601 - PubMed
    1. Mamula P, Adler D G, Conway J D et al. Colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:1201–1209. - PubMed
    1. Rex D K, Johnson D A, Anderson J C et al. American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2009 [corrected] Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:739–750. - PubMed