Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Aug;54(8):1100-1109.
doi: 10.1111/psyp.12866. Epub 2017 Apr 6.

Short- and long-term stability of alpha asymmetry in infants: Baseline and affective measures

Affiliations

Short- and long-term stability of alpha asymmetry in infants: Baseline and affective measures

Rebecca J Brooker et al. Psychophysiology. 2017 Aug.

Abstract

Asymmetry in cortical activity was tested for short- and long-term stability during the first year of life. Infants (N = 129) completed a total of four laboratory visits: two visits occurred about 1 week apart when infants were 6 months old, and two visits occurred about 1 week apart when infants were 12 months of age. At each laboratory visit, EEG readings were taken during five 1-min, neutral baselines as well as during a negative and a positive emotion-eliciting task. The stability of hemispheric asymmetry was assessed at midfrontal (F3/4, F7/8) and parietal (P3/4) electrode sites. Asymmetry in baseline and fear-eliciting episodes showed moderate short-term stability. Long-term stability was apparent when assessments were composited at 6 months and 12 months. Frontal asymmetry was greater than parietal asymmetry for baseline recordings. There was minimal evidence for stability in asymmetry during positive emotion tasks. Results are discussed with regard to the collection and interpretation of alpha asymmetry measures during infancy.

Keywords: EEG asymmetry; development; emotion; infancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Alpha asymmetry stability across contexts

References

    1. Andrew T, Hart DJ, Snieder H, de Lange M, Spector TD, MacGregor AJ. Are twins and singletons comparable? A study of disease-related and lifestyle characteristics in adult women. Twin Research and Human Genetics. 2001;4(06):464–477. doi: 10.1375/twin.4.6.464. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barkovich AJ, Kjos BO, Jackson DE, Norman D. Normal maturation of the neonatal and infant brain: MR imaging at 1.5 T. Radiology. 1988;166(1):173–180. doi: 10.1148/radiology.166.1.3336675. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barrett LF, Gross J, Conner Christensen T, Benvenuto M. Knowing what you’re feeling and knowing what to do about it: Mapping the relation between emotion differentiation and emotion regulation. Cognition & Emotion. 2001;15(6):713–724. doi: 10.1080/02699930143000239. - DOI
    1. Bertrand O, Perrin F, Pernier J. A theoretical justification of the average reference in topographic evoked potential studies. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section. 1985;62(6):462–464. doi: 10.1016/0168-5597(85)90058-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bracewell RN. The fast Hartley transform. Proceedings of the IEEE. 1984;72(8):1010. doi: 10.1109/PROC.1984.12968. - DOI