This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!

Skip to main page content

Add to Collections

Your saved search

Name of saved search:

Search terms:

Test search terms

Would you like email updates of new search results?

Yes
No

Email: (change)

Frequency:

Which day?

Which day?

Report format:

Send at most:

Send even when there aren't any new results

Optional text in email:

Your RSS Feed

Comment

. 2018 Feb;125(3):384.

doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14678. Epub 2017 Aug 9.

Cost-effectiveness analysis and obstetrics: the time has come

R M Silver¹, B D Einerson¹

Affiliations

PMID: 28383770
DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.14678

Comment

Cost-effectiveness analysis and obstetrics: the time has come

R M Silver et al. BJOG. 2018 Feb.

. 2018 Feb;125(3):384.

doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14678. Epub 2017 Aug 9.

Authors

R M Silver¹, B D Einerson¹

Affiliation

¹ University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

PMID: 28383770
DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.14678

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment on

Comparing induction of labour with oral misoprostol or Foley catheter at term: cost-effectiveness analysis of a randomised controlled multi-centre non-inferiority trial.
Ten Eikelder M, van Baaren GJ, Oude Rengerink K, Jozwiak M, de Leeuw JW, Kleiverda G, Evers I, de Boer K, Brons J, Bloemenkamp K, Mol BW. Ten Eikelder M, et al. BJOG. 2018 Feb;125(3):375-383. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14706. Epub 2017 Aug 8. BJOG. 2018. PMID: 28440898 Clinical Trial.

Publication types

Actions

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions

Substances

Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
- Wiley
Other Literature Sources
- scite Smart Citations