Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Sep;23(3):458-479.
doi: 10.1037/met0000128. Epub 2017 Apr 6.

Multilevel factorial designs with experiment-induced clustering

Affiliations

Multilevel factorial designs with experiment-induced clustering

Inbal Nahum-Shani et al. Psychol Methods. 2018 Sep.

Abstract

Factorial experimental designs have many applications in the behavioral sciences. In the context of intervention development, factorial experiments play a critical role in building and optimizing high-quality, multicomponent behavioral interventions. One challenge in implementing factorial experiments in the behavioral sciences is that individuals are often clustered in social or administrative units and may be more similar to each other than to individuals in other clusters. This means that data are dependent within clusters. Power planning resources are available for factorial experiments in which the multilevel structure of the data is due to individuals' membership in groups that existed before experimentation. However, in many cases clusters are generated in the course of the study itself. Such experiment-induced clustering (EIC) requires different data analysis models and power planning resources from those available for multilevel experimental designs in which clusters exist prior to experimentation. Despite the common occurrence of both experimental designs with EIC and factorial designs, a bridge has yet to be built between EIC and factorial designs. Therefore, resources are limited or nonexistent for planning factorial experiments that involve EIC. This article seeks to bridge this gap by extending prior models for EIC, developed for single-factor experiments, to factorial experiments involving various types of EIC. We also offer power formulas to help investigators decide whether a particular experimental design involving EIC is feasible. We demonstrate that factorial experiments can be powerful and feasible even with EIC. We discuss design considerations and directions for future research. (PsycINFO Database Record

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Baker TB, Gustafson DH, Shah D. How can research keep up with eHealth? Ten strategies for increasing the timeliness and usefulness of eHealth research. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2014;16(2):e36. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baldwin SA, Bauer DJ, Stice E, Rohde P. Evaluating models for partially clustered designs. Psychological Methods. 2011;16(2):149–165. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bauer DJ, Sterba SK, Hallfors DD. Evaluating group-based interventions when control participants are ungrouped. Multivariate Behavioral Research. 2008;43:210–236. doi: 10.1080/00273170802034810. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berggraf L, Ulvenes PG, Øktedalen T, Hoffart A, Stiles T, McCullough L, Wampold BE. Experience of affects predicting sense of self and others in short-term dynamic and cognitive therapy. Psychotherapy. 2014;51(2):246. - PubMed
    1. Candel MJ, Van Breukelen GJ. Varying cluster sizes in trials with clusters in one treatment arm: Sample size adjustments when testing treatment effects with linear mixed models. Statistics in Medicine. 2009;28(18):2307–2324. - PubMed