Assessment of the ability of CT urography with low-dose multi-phasic excretory phases for opacification of the urinary system
- PMID: 28384174
- PMCID: PMC5383231
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174800
Assessment of the ability of CT urography with low-dose multi-phasic excretory phases for opacification of the urinary system
Abstract
Objective: To prospectively evaluate the ability of CT urography with a low-dose multi-phasic excretory phase for opacification of the urinary system.
Materials and methods: Thirty-two patients underwent CT urography with low-dose multi-phasic s using adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D acquired at 5-, 10-, and 15-minute delays. Opacification scores of the upper urinary tracts and the urinary bladder were assigned for each excretory phase by two radiologists, who recorded whether adequate (>75%) or complete (100%) opacification of the upper urinary tract and urinary bladder was achieved in each patient. Adequate and complete opacification rates of the upper urinary tracts and the urinary bladder were compared among three excretory phases and among combined multi-phasic excretory phases using Cochran's Q test.
Results: There was no significant difference among three excretory phases with 5-, 10-, and 15-minute delays in adequate (56.3, 43.8, and 63.5%, respectively; P = 0.174) and complete opacification rates (9.3, 15.6, and 18.7%, respectively; P = 0.417) of the upper urinary tracts. Combined tri-phasic excretory phases significantly improved adequate and complete opacification rates to 84.4% and 43.8%, respectively (P = 0.002). In contrast, there were significant differences among three excretory phases for the rate of adequate (31.3, 84.4, and 93.8%, respectively; P<0.001) and complete opacification (21.9, 53.1, and 81.3%, respectively; P<0.001) of the urinary bladder. Multi-phasic excretory phases did not improve these rates because opacification was always better with a longer delay.
Conclusion: Although multi-phasic acquisition of excretory phases is effective at improving opacification of the upper urinary tracts, complete opacification is difficult even with tri-phasic acquisition.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
References
-
- Nawfel RD, Judy PF, Schleipman AR, Silverman SG. Patient radiation dose at CT urography and conventional urography. Radiology 2004; 232(1):126–132. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2321030222 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Jinzaki M, Matsumoto K, Kikuchi E, Sato K, Horiguchi Y, Nishiwaki Y, et al. Comparison of CT urography and excretory urography in the detection and localization of urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011: 196(5):1102–1109. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.5249 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Dillman JR, Caoili EM, Cohan RH. Multi-detector CT urography: a one-stop renal and urinary tract imaging modality. Abdom Imaging 2007; 32(4):519–529. doi: 10.1007/s00261-007-9185-5 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Caoili EM, Cohan RH, Korobkin M, Platt JF, Francis IR, Faerber GJ, et al. Urinary tract abnormalities: initial experience with multi-detector row CT urography. Radiology 2002; 222:353–360. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2222010667 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Van Der Molen AJ, Cowan NC, Mueller-Lisse UG, Nolte-Ernsting CCA, Takahashi S, Cohan RH, et al. CT urography: definition, indications and techniques. A guideline for clinical practice. Eur Radiol 2008; 18(1):4–17. doi: 10.1007/s00330-007-0792-x - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
