Analyses of the probiotic property and stress resistance-related genes of Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis NCDO 2118 through comparative genomics and in vitro assays
- PMID: 28384209
- PMCID: PMC5383145
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175116
Analyses of the probiotic property and stress resistance-related genes of Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis NCDO 2118 through comparative genomics and in vitro assays
Abstract
Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis NCDO 2118 was recently reported to alleviate colitis symptoms via its anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory activities, which are exerted by exported proteins that are not produced by L. lactis subsp. lactis IL1403. Here, we used in vitro and in silico approaches to characterize the genomic structure, the safety aspects, and the immunomodulatory activity of this strain. Through comparative genomics, we identified genomic islands, phage regions, bile salt and acid stress resistance genes, bacteriocins, adhesion-related and antibiotic resistance genes, and genes encoding proteins that are putatively secreted, expressed in vitro and absent from IL1403. The high degree of similarity between all Lactococcus suggests that the Symbiotic Islands commonly shared by both NCDO 2118 and KF147 may be responsible for their close relationship and their adaptation to plants. The predicted bacteriocins may play an important role against the invasion of competing strains. The genes related to the acid and bile salt stresses may play important roles in gastrointestinal tract survival, whereas the adhesion proteins are important for persistence in the gut, culminating in the competitive exclusion of other bacteria. Finally, the five secreted and expressed proteins may be important targets for studies of new anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory proteins. Altogether, the analyses performed here highlight the potential use of this strain as a target for the future development of probiotic foods.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures




Similar articles
-
Different effects of two newly-isolated probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum 15HN and Lactococcus lactis subsp. Lactis 44Lac strains from traditional dairy products on cancer cell lines.Anaerobe. 2014 Dec;30:51-9. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2014.08.009. Epub 2014 Aug 27. Anaerobe. 2014. PMID: 25168457
-
Genome-Wide Comparison Reveals a Probiotic Strain Lactococcus Lactis WFLU12 Isolated from the Gastrointestinal Tract of Olive Flounder (Paralichthys Olivaceus) Harboring Genes Supporting Probiotic Action.Mar Drugs. 2018 Apr 24;16(5):140. doi: 10.3390/md16050140. Mar Drugs. 2018. PMID: 29695124 Free PMC article.
-
Bacteriocinogenic Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis DF04Mi isolated from goat milk: evaluation of the probiotic potential.Braz J Microbiol. 2014 Oct 9;45(3):1047-54. doi: 10.1590/s1517-83822014000300038. eCollection 2014. Braz J Microbiol. 2014. PMID: 25477942 Free PMC article.
-
Physical and genetic maps of the chromosome of the Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis strain IL1403 and Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris strain MG1363.Dev Biol Stand. 1995;85:597-603. Dev Biol Stand. 1995. PMID: 8586238 Review. No abstract available.
-
Comparative and functional genomics of lactococci.FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2005 Aug;29(3):411-33. doi: 10.1016/j.femsre.2005.04.004. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2005. PMID: 15936843 Review.
Cited by
-
Metagenomics of pigmented and cholesterol gallstones: the putative role of bacteria.Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 25;8(1):11218. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-29571-8. Sci Rep. 2018. PMID: 30046045 Free PMC article.
-
Probiogenomics of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. lactis CIDCA 133: In Silico, In Vitro, and In Vivo Approaches.Microorganisms. 2021 Apr 14;9(4):829. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9040829. Microorganisms. 2021. PMID: 33919849 Free PMC article.
-
Probiotic evaluation, adherence capability and safety assessment of Lactococcus lactis strain isolated from an important herb "Murraya koenigii".Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 6;14(1):15565. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66597-7. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38971851 Free PMC article.
-
A Controlled Fermented Samjunghwan Herbal Formula Ameliorates Non-alcoholic Hepatosteatosis in HepG2 Cells and OLETF Rats.Front Pharmacol. 2018 Jun 19;9:596. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00596. eCollection 2018. Front Pharmacol. 2018. PMID: 29971000 Free PMC article.
-
Quantitative Proteomic Analysis of the Response of Probiotic Putative Lactococcus lactis NCDO 2118 Strain to Different Oxygen Availability Under Temperature Variation.Front Microbiol. 2019 Apr 11;10:759. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00759. eCollection 2019. Front Microbiol. 2019. PMID: 31031733 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Khalid K. An overview of lactic acid bacteria. International Journal of Biosciences. 2011;1: 1–13.
-
- Pfeiler EA, Klaenhammer TR. The genomics of lactic acid bacteria. Trends Microbiol. 2007;15: 546–553. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2007.09.010 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Bolotin A, Wincker P, Mauger S, Jaillon O, Malarme K, Weissenbach J, et al. The complete genome sequence of the lactic acid bacterium Lactococcus lactis ssp. lactis IL1403. Genome Res. 2001;11: 731–753. doi: 10.1101/gr.169701 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Smeianov V, Wechter P, Broadbent J, Hughes J, Rodríguez B, Christensen TK, et al. Comparative high-density microarray analysis of gene expression during growth of Lactobacillus helveticus in milk versus rich culture medium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007;73: 2661–2672. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00005-07 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Díaz-Muñiz I, Banavara DS, Budinich MF, Rankin SA, Dudley EG, Steele JL, et al. Lactobacillus casei metabolic potential to utilize citrate as an energy source in ripening cheese: a bioinformatics approach. J Appl Microbiol. 2006;101: 872–882. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.02965.x - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Molecular Biology Databases