Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Feb;11(2):AC01-AC04.
doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/23955.9210. Epub 2017 Feb 1.

Morphometry of Proximal Femur in Indian Population

Affiliations

Morphometry of Proximal Femur in Indian Population

Minakshi Verma et al. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Feb.

Abstract

Introduction: Total hip arthroplasty is a commonly performed surgery now-a-day. There are regional and racial variations in the stature of the population worldwide. So there is always need of population specific data for making best fit prosthesis.

Aim: The present study was done to measure the parameters of proximal femur and to analyse their correlation by using standard statistical analysis.

Materials and methods: Ninety one dry bones (44 left and 47 right) were used. Femur Head Diameter (FHD), Femur Neck Length (FNL), Femur Neck Diameter (FND), Femur Neck Thickness (FNT), Cervicodiaphyseal Angle (CDA) was directly measured with the help of anthropometric instruments. Femur Head Offset (FHO) and Vertical Offset (VO) were measured in the anteroposterior digital photographs.

Results: Normally distributed variables were compared using Student's t-test (Unpaired data) to analyse significant effect. There was a significant difference between right and left side of FND and CDA. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to analyse the relationship among variables. FHO had high correlation with the VO (0.687, p<0.001).

Conclusion: These parameters can be used for designing the prosthesis and plates for hip joint reconstructive surgeries suitable for Indian population.

Keywords: Femur head offset; Hip prosthesis; Vertical offset.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

[Table/Fig-1]:
[Table/Fig-1]:
Length of femur in craniocaudal axis with osteometric board.
[Table/Fig-2]:
[Table/Fig-2]:
Diameter of femoral head in the craniocaudal axis.
[Table/Fig-3]:
[Table/Fig-3]:
Length of femoral neck in craniocaudal axis.
[Table/Fig-4]:
[Table/Fig-4]:
Femur neck thickness in anteroposterior axis.
[Table/Fig-5]:
[Table/Fig-5]:
Femur neck diameter in craniocaudal axis.
[Table/Fig-6]:
[Table/Fig-6]:
Cervicodiaphyseal angle with goniometer.
[Table/Fig-7]:
[Table/Fig-7]:
An anteroposterior photograph demonstrating linear measurements of proximal femur.

References

    1. Chowdhary S, Naushaba H, Begum J, Ahmed S, Khan LF, Parash TH, et al. Morphometrical and topographical anatomy of position of nutrient foramen on fully ossified left femur. Delta Med Coll J. 2013;1(1):13–18.
    1. Nurzenski MK, Briffa NK, Price IR, Khoo CCB, Devine A, Beck JT. Geometric indices of bone strength are associated with physical activity and dietary calcium intake in Healthy older women. J Bone Miner Res. 2007;22(3):416–24. - PubMed
    1. McGrory J, Morrey BF, Chahalan TD, Kai-Nan AN, Cabanela ME. Effect of femoral offset on range of motion and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg. 1995;77(B):865–69. - PubMed
    1. Rubin PJ, Leyvraz PF, Aubaniac JM, Argenson JN, Esteve P, Roguin BD. The morphology of the proximal femur: a three dimensional radiographic analysis. Journal of bone and Joint Surgery B. 1992;74(1):28–32. - PubMed
    1. Hushmann O, Rubin PJ, Leyvraz PF, De Roguin B, Argenson JN. Three dimensional morphology of the proximal femur. J Arthroplasty. 1997;12(4):444–50. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources