Assessment of Operator Variability in Risk-Standardized Mortality Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Report From the NCDR
- PMID: 28385404
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.12.019
Assessment of Operator Variability in Risk-Standardized Mortality Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Report From the NCDR
Abstract
Objectives: This study sought to determine variability and stability in risk-standardized mortality rates (RSMR) of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) operators meeting minimum case volume standards and identify differences in case mix and practice patterns that may account for RSMR variability.
Background: RSMR has been suggested as a metric to evaluate the performance of PCI operators; however, variability of operator-level RSMR and the stability of this metric over time among the same operator are unknown.
Methods: The authors calculated mean RSMRs for PCI operators with average annual volume of ≥50 cases in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI Registry. Funnel plots were used to account for operator case volume. Demographic, clinical, and treatment variables of patients treated by operators with outlying high or low RSMRs (identified by RMSR greater than or less than 2 σ above or below the mean [analogous to 2 SD], respectively) were compared with nonoutlier operators. RMSR stability was assessed by calculating average annual operator RMSR during the study period and by determining if operators were consistently classified into RMSR categories in each year.
Results: Between October 1, 2009, and September 30, 2014, a total of 2,352,174 PCIs were performed at 1,373 hospitals by 3,760 operators. Of these, 242 operators (6.5%) had RSMR >2 σ above the mean and 156 operators (4.1%) had RSMR >2 σ below the mean. Both high and low RSMR outlier operators treated patients with lower expected mortality risk, compared with nonoutlier operators. There was significant instability in annual operator RMSR during the study period.
Conclusions: There is significant variability in risk-standardized PCI mortality among U.S. operators meeting minimum volume standards that is not explained by case mix or procedure characteristics. Operator RMSR was unstable from year to year, thus limiting its utility as a sole performance measure for PCI quality.
Keywords: coronary artery disease; percutaneous coronary intervention; quality measure; risk standardized mortality rate.
Published by Elsevier Inc.
Comment in
-
In-Hospital Risk-Adjusted Mortality Poorly Reflects PCI Quality: So Why Is it Being Used?JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Apr 10;10(7):683-685. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.01.008. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017. PMID: 28385405 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Relationship Between Operator Volume and Long-Term Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Circulation. 2019 Jan 22;139(4):458-472. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.033325. Circulation. 2019. PMID: 30586696 Free PMC article.
-
When high-volume PCI operators in high-volume hospitals move to lower volume hospitals-Do they still maintain high volume and quality of outcomes?Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Oct 1;92(4):644-650. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27403. Epub 2017 Oct 31. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018. PMID: 29086474
-
Appropriateness and Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention at Top-Ranked and Nonranked Hospitals in the United States.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Feb 26;11(4):342-350. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.10.042. Epub 2017 Nov 12. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018. PMID: 29471947
-
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Relationship Between Procedural Volume and Outcomes.Curr Cardiol Rep. 2016 Apr;18(4):39. doi: 10.1007/s11886-016-0709-x. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2016. PMID: 26960424 Review.
-
Cardiovascular care facts: a report from the national cardiovascular data registry: 2011.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Nov 19;62(21):1931-1947. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.099. Epub 2013 Sep 18. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013. PMID: 24036027 Review.
Cited by
-
Variation in Likelihood of Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Among US Hospitals.J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Mar 4;14(5):e038317. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.038317. Epub 2025 Feb 19. J Am Heart Assoc. 2025. PMID: 39968808 Free PMC article.
-
Peer evaluation and feedback for invasive medical procedures: a systematic review.BMC Med Educ. 2022 Jul 29;22(1):581. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03652-9. BMC Med Educ. 2022. PMID: 35906652 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of Peer Review of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Operator Performance.Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2025 Jan;18(1):e011159. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.124.011159. Epub 2025 Jan 3. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2025. PMID: 39749476 Free PMC article.
-
Government Regulation and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Volume, Access and Outcomes: Insights From the Washington State Cardiac Care Outcomes Assessment Program.J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Sep 6;11(17):e025607. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.025607. Epub 2022 Sep 3. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022. PMID: 36056726 Free PMC article.
-
Coronary Revascularization in High-Risk Stable Patients With Significant Comorbidities: Challenges in Decision-Making.Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2019 Feb 9;21(1):5. doi: 10.1007/s11936-019-0706-7. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2019. PMID: 30739215 Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous