The Voice of Surrogate Decision-Makers. Family Responses to Prognostic Information in Chronic Critical Illness
- PMID: 28387538
- PMCID: PMC5649978
- DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201701-0201OC
The Voice of Surrogate Decision-Makers. Family Responses to Prognostic Information in Chronic Critical Illness
Abstract
Rationale: Information from clinicians about the expected course of the patient's illness is relevant and important for decision-making by surrogates for chronically critically ill patients on mechanical ventilation.
Objectives: To observe how surrogates of chronically critically ill patients respond to information about prognosis from palliative care clinicians.
Methods: This was a qualitative analysis of a consecutive sample of audio-recorded meetings from a larger, multisite, randomized trial of structured informational and supportive meetings led by a palliative care physician and nurse practitioner for surrogates of patients in medical intensive care units with chronic critical illness (i.e., adults mechanically ventilated for ≥7 days and expected to remain ventilated and survive for ≥72 h).
Measurements and main results: A total of 66 audio-recorded meetings involving 51 intervention group surrogates for 43 patients were analyzed using grounded theory. Six main categories of surrogate responses to prognostic information were identified: (1) receptivity, (2) deflection/rejection, (3) emotion, (4) characterization of patient, (5) consideration of surrogate role, and (6) mobilization of support. Surrogates responded in multiple and even antithetical ways, within and across meetings.
Conclusions: Prognostic disclosure by skilled clinician communicators evokes a repertoire of responses from surrogates for the chronically critically ill. Recognition of these response patterns may help all clinicians better communicate their support to patients and families facing chronic critical illness and inform interventions to support surrogate decision-makers in intensive care units. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 01230099).
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01230099.
Keywords: critical illness; health communication; mechanical ventilation; palliative care.
Comment in
-
Looking beyond the Tip of a Tusk: Balancing the Evidence in Prognosis-related Communication.Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Oct 1;196(7):803-804. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201704-0851ED. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017. PMID: 28510476 No abstract available.
References
-
- Hough CL, Caldwell ES, Cox CE, Douglas IS, Kahn JM, White DB, Seeley EJ, Bangdiwala SI, Rubenfeld GD, Angus DC, et al. ProVent Investigators and the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute’s Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network. Development and validation of a mortality prediction model for patients receiving 14 days of mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med. 2015;43:2339–2345. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Cox CE, Carson SS, Lindquist JH, Olsen MK, Govert JA, Chelluri L Quality of Life After Mechanical Ventilation in the Aged (QOL-MV) Investigators. Differences in one-year health outcomes and resource utilization by definition of prolonged mechanical ventilation: a prospective cohort study. Crit Care. 2007;11:R9. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Damuth E, Mitchell JA, Bartock JL, Roberts BW, Trzeciak S. Long-term survival of critically ill patients treated with prolonged mechanical ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Respir Med. 2015;3:544–553. - PubMed
-
- Nelson JE, Tandon N, Mercado AF, Camhi SL, Ely EW, Morrison RS. Brain dysfunction: another burden for the chronically critically ill. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:1993–1999. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical