Long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of the Prestige LP artificial cervical disc replacement at 2 levels: results from a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial
- PMID: 28387616
- DOI: 10.3171/2016.11.SPINE16746
Long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of the Prestige LP artificial cervical disc replacement at 2 levels: results from a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to assess long-term clinical safety and effectiveness in patients undergoing anterior cervical surgery using the Prestige LP artificial disc replacement (ADR) prosthesis to treat degenerative cervical spine disease at 2 adjacent levels compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). METHODS A prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter FDA-approved clinical trial was conducted at 30 US centers, comparing the low-profile titanium ceramic composite-based Prestige LP ADR (n = 209) at 2 levels with ACDF (n = 188). Clinical and radiographic evaluations were completed preoperatively, intraoperatively, and at regular postoperative intervals to 84 months. The primary end point was overall success, a composite variable that included key safety and efficacy considerations. RESULTS At 84 months, the Prestige LP ADR demonstrated statistical superiority over fusion for overall success (observed rate 78.6% vs 62.7%; posterior probability of superiority [PPS] = 99.8%), Neck Disability Index success (87.0% vs 75.6%; PPS = 99.3%), and neurological success (91.6% vs 82.1%; PPS = 99.0%). All other study effectiveness measures were at least noninferior for ADR compared with ACDF. There was no statistically significant difference in the overall rate of implant-related or implant/surgical procedure-related adverse events up to 84 months (26.6% and 27.7%, respectively). However, the Prestige LP group had fewer serious (Grade 3 or 4) implant- or implant/surgical procedure-related adverse events (3.2% vs 7.2%, log hazard ratio [LHR] and 95% Bayesian credible interval [95% BCI] -1.19 [-2.29 to -0.15]). Patients in the Prestige LP group also underwent statistically significantly fewer second surgical procedures at the index levels (4.2%) than the fusion group (14.7%) (LHR -1.29 [95% BCI -2.12 to -0.46]). Angular range of motion at superior- and inferior-treated levels on average was maintained in the Prestige LP ADR group to 84 months. CONCLUSIONS The low-profile artificial cervical disc in this study, Prestige LP, implanted at 2 adjacent levels, maintains improved clinical outcomes and segmental motion 84 months after surgery and is a safe and effective alternative to fusion. Clinical trial registration no.: NCT00637156 (clinicaltrials.gov).
Keywords: 2-level disc disease; ACDF = anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; ADR = artificial disc replacement; AE = adverse event; BCI = Bayesian credible interval; DDD = degenerative disc disease; FSU = functional spinal unit; HO = heterotopic ossification; LHR = log hazard ratio; MCS = Mental Component Summary; NDI = Neck Disability Index; PCS = Physical Component Summary; PPS = posterior probability of superiority; Prestige LP disc replacement; TDR = total disc replacement; artificial cervical disc; cervical degenerative disc disease; cervical disc arthroplasty.
Similar articles
-
Cervical disc arthroplasty with the Prestige LP disc versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, at 2 levels: results of a prospective, multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial at 24 months.J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Jun;26(6):653-667. doi: 10.3171/2016.10.SPINE16264. Epub 2017 Mar 17. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017. PMID: 28304237 Clinical Trial.
-
Two-level cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: 10-year outcomes of a prospective, randomized investigational device exemption clinical trial.J Neurosurg Spine. 2019 Jun 21;31(4):508-518. doi: 10.3171/2019.4.SPINE19157. Print 2019 Oct 1. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019. PMID: 31226684
-
Cervical disc arthroplasty with PRESTIGE LP disc versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective, multicenter investigational device exemption study.J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Nov;23(5):558-573. doi: 10.3171/2015.1.SPINE14589. Epub 2015 Jul 31. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015. PMID: 26230424
-
Cervical arthroplasty: what does the labeling say?Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Feb;42(2):E2. doi: 10.3171/2016.11.FOCUS16414. Neurosurg Focus. 2017. PMID: 28142245 Review.
-
Long-term Results Comparing Cervical Disc Arthroplasty to Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Orthop Surg. 2020 Feb;12(1):16-30. doi: 10.1111/os.12585. Epub 2019 Dec 21. Orthop Surg. 2020. PMID: 31863642 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Outcomes of cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical arthrodesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials with a minimum follow-up of 7-year.Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 Jul;33(5):1875-1884. doi: 10.1007/s00590-022-03365-1. Epub 2022 Aug 20. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023. PMID: 35986813
-
Complications and reoperations in young versus old patients undergoing cervical disc arthroplasty.N Am Spine Soc J. 2025 Jan 21;21:100589. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2025.100589. eCollection 2025 Mar. N Am Spine Soc J. 2025. PMID: 40034338 Free PMC article.
-
Cervical Disc Arthroplasty (CDA) versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) for Two-Level Cervical Disc Degenerative Disease: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Clin Med. 2024 May 29;13(11):3203. doi: 10.3390/jcm13113203. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38892914 Free PMC article. Review.
-
ACDF vs TDR for patients with cervical spondylosis - an 8 year follow up study.BMC Surg. 2017 Nov 28;17(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12893-017-0316-9. BMC Surg. 2017. PMID: 29183306 Free PMC article.
-
Research protocol: Cervical Arthroplasty Cost Effectiveness Study (CACES): economic evaluation of anterior cervical discectomy with arthroplasty (ACDA) versus anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (ACDF) in the surgical treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease - a randomized controlled trial.Trials. 2022 Aug 26;23(1):715. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06574-5. Trials. 2022. PMID: 36028916 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous