Point/counterpoint: randomized versus single-arm phase II clinical trials for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma
- PMID: 28388713
- PMCID: PMC5464324
- DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nox030
Point/counterpoint: randomized versus single-arm phase II clinical trials for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma
Keywords: clinical trials; newly diagnosed glioblastoma; phase II; randomized; single-arm.
Comment in
-
How can we develop therapies for glioblastoma more efficiently? Randomized versus single-arm studies.Neuro Oncol. 2017 Apr 1;19(4):459-460. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nox041. Neuro Oncol. 2017. PMID: 28388714 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Gehan EA, The determination of the number of patients required in a preliminary and a follow-up trial of a new chemotherapeutic agent. J.Chronic Dis. 1961;13:346–353. - PubMed
-
- Fleming TR. One-sample multiple testing procedure for phase II clinical trials. Biometrics. 1982;38(1):143–151. - PubMed
-
- Simon R. Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1989;10(1):1–10. - PubMed
-
- Sargent DJ, Chan V, Goldberg RM. A three-outcome design for phase II clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 2001;22(2):117–125. - PubMed
-
- Bryant J, Day R. Incorporating toxicity considerations into the design of two-stage phase II clinical trials. Biometrics. 1995;51(4):1372–1383. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
