A comparison of nicotine dependence among exclusive E-cigarette and cigarette users in the PATH study

Abstract

Electronic cigarettes ("e-cigs") have recently gained in popularity, but their health risks, including dependence potential are unclear. This study analyzed the adult database from the Wave 1 Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study, a nationally representative survey of tobacco use in the United States, to assess the relative level of dependence among adult, exclusive everyday users of e-cigarettes and cigarettes. Of the total 32,320 observations from the Wave 1 PATH adult database, 3586 (5.9%, weighted) were eligible for our analysis population. Among those who met the eligibility criteria, 156 (4.6%) were exclusive e-cig users, and 3430 (95.4%) were exclusive cigarette smokers. Our results show that e-cig users reported a significantly longer time-to-first-use of the day after waking (measured in minutes) compared to cigarette smokers after adjusting for confounders (adjusted geometric mean [95% confidence limits (CL)]: 29.2 [24.4-34.9] vs. 20.0 [18.7, 21.5]). In addition, cigarette smokers were significantly more likely to consider themselves addicted (Adj. Odds Ratio [95% CL]: 6.9 [4.5-10.7]); have strong cravings (2.9 [1.9-4.2]); find it difficult in the past 12months to refrain from using their product in places where it was prohibited (6.4 [2.9-14.3]); and feel like they really needed to use their product (3.9 [2.4-6.4]). These results are consistent with previous studies, in finding that exclusive daily e-cigarette users are less dependent on their respective product than comparable cigarette smokers.

Keywords: Addiction; Adults; Cigarettes; Dependence; E-cigarettes; Electronic cigarettes; Inhaled nicotine device; Nicotine; Smoking; Tobacco.

Figure 1. Flowchart: derivation of the study population

* Please note that the PATH adult survey intentionally oversampled tobacco users, young adults and black persons. While performing weighted analyses accounts for this, the unweighted observation frequencies presented in this figure are solely used for illustration purposes and are not meant to be interpreted as representative proportions.